Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Real Estate

Adverse Possession of Land

A neighbor's fence has stood a few feet onto your lot for as long as anyone remembers, or you have maintained a strip of land your deed does not include. A survey or a sale brings the question to the surface: whose land is it now?

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Adverse Possession of Land: what usually happens

How these claims usually arise

Adverse possession of land lets a person who has occupied someone else's property for a long enough time, in a way that challenged the owner's rights, ask a court to recognize title. Disputes most often surface when a property is surveyed for a sale or refinance, when a new owner moves in, or when someone starts building near the line. Courts look closely at how the land was used and for how long. New York's current statute also asks whether the claimant had a reasonable basis for believing the land was theirs. It also treats some minor encroachments and routine upkeep across the line, which can include a fence or hedge, as permissive rather than adverse, though older claims may fall under earlier rules.

Evidence on either side

Gather the deeds, the title policy, and every survey you can find, including older surveys from prior owners. Photographs over the years, aerial images, tax records, and records of improvements such as fences, driveways, or structures can help show when and how the land was used. Statements from long-time neighbors or former owners about how the area was treated can matter. Permission is often the central question, so any letter, conversation, or arrangement suggesting the owner allowed the use deserves attention. If you are the record owner, talk with a lawyer before tearing down a fence or confronting the neighbor, because self-help can create new problems.

How the question gets resolved

The issue is usually decided through an action to quiet title, in which a court determines who owns the disputed strip. Many of these disputes resolve instead through a boundary line agreement, a sale of the strip, or an easement, which can be less costly than litigation and easier to live with as neighbors. Public land is generally not subject to adverse possession claims. In a first conversation we review the surveys and deeds, ask how long the current use has gone on, and talk through whether litigation or an agreement fits your goals, particularly if a sale or closing is pending.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about adverse possession of land and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.