Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate & Bankruptcy

Bankruptcy and Insolvency

People often use the two words as if they meant the same thing. In US law they do not, and the difference affects what a company or individual can do when debts can no longer be paid.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Bankruptcy and Insolvency: what usually happens

Condition versus proceeding

Insolvency describes a financial condition, usually measured by whether debts exceed assets or whether obligations can be paid as they come due. Bankruptcy is a federal court proceeding under the Bankruptcy Code. A debtor can be insolvent without filing, and a voluntary bankruptcy filing does not require proof of insolvency, although a case filed in bad faith can be dismissed. The distinction matters because many legal consequences, such as challenges to transfers, turn on insolvency regardless of whether a case is filed. Understanding both helps in choosing the right path.

Federal bankruptcy and state-law alternatives

Bankruptcy in the United States is governed by federal law and heard in federal bankruptcy courts. Outside bankruptcy, state law provides other tools, such as assignments for the benefit of creditors, receiverships, and ordinary judgment enforcement. These alternatives can be less expensive but generally lack features like the automatic stay or a discharge, and a state-law process cannot release debts the way a bankruptcy case can. Cross-border cases add another layer, since a foreign insolvency proceeding may be recognized in a US court through Chapter 15. Gather financial statements, debt documents, and information about assets in every country where they are located.

Choosing the framework

We help clients decide whether a bankruptcy filing, a state-law process, or a negotiated workout fits their situation. For businesses, the decision often depends on whether the company will continue operating and how its assets are encumbered. For individuals, it depends on income, assets, and the kinds of debt involved. When a company has a future, the question is usually whether creditors can be brought to agreement without a court; when it does not, the question is which process returns the most value at the least cost. Where assets or creditors are located in Korea or other countries, we coordinate with counsel there. The first step is a clear picture of the finances and the goals.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about bankruptcy and insolvency and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.