Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Bid Rigging

A competitor calls to suggest that this time it is your company's turn, or a colleague mentions that the bids on a public contract were discussed in advance. Bid rigging rarely starts with a plan; it starts with a conversation that seems routine to the people in it.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Bid Rigging: what usually happens

How bid rigging is treated

Agreements among competitors about who will be awarded a contract, or about what each will bid, are treated as serious antitrust violations in the United States. The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice prosecutes them criminally, and state attorneys general, including New York's, enforce their own antitrust laws as well. Public procurement draws particular attention, and federal agencies run a dedicated effort aimed at collusion in government purchasing. Beyond prosecution, companies can face civil claims from buyers who paid inflated prices, along with suspension or debarment from public work. Individual employees can be charged personally, not only the company.

If questions are being asked

Investigations often surface through a subpoena, an unexpected visit from agents, or a call from a procurement officer. Preserve documents and messages immediately, including those on personal phones and messaging apps, and suspend any routine deletion. Do not discuss the matter with competitors, and do not coach employees about what to say. Employees contacted by agents may speak with them or decline, and they may want their own counsel, since their interests and the company's can diverge. Knowingly giving false information to investigators is a separate crime, so any statement should be truthful and made with advice.

Decisions that come early

Timing can matter a great deal. The Antitrust Division runs a leniency program that can offer significant benefits to a company that reports collusion and cooperates, but the benefit is generally tied to being first, so whether and when to approach the government deserves prompt attention. In an early meeting we look at what has happened so far, who knows about it, and whether an internal review should be started under counsel's direction so that privilege protects it as far as the law allows. We also consider whether individuals need separate representation and how the company should handle the bids it is preparing now. These decisions are difficult to revisit once made, so we take them carefully.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about bid rigging and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.