Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Bribery Compliance

A distributor asks for a success fee that seems out of proportion, a government customer hints that a donation to a local charity would help, or your board wants to know whether the company's gift policy would survive scrutiny.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Bribery Compliance: what usually happens

Where compliance decisions actually happen

Bribery compliance is less about a policy binder than about the many small decisions employees make: whether to approve a dinner, a travel invitation, a charitable contribution, or a consultant's invoice. Risk is not limited to foreign officials. Commercial bribery of private-sector employees is a crime in New York and many other places, and dealings with domestic public officials bring their own gift and lobbying rules. Companies with international operations may also be subject to the FCPA and to anti-bribery laws of other countries, such as the United Kingdom. A workable program gives employees clear thresholds and a fast way to ask before they act.

Intermediaries carry much of the risk

A large share of corporate bribery cases have involved payments routed through agents, distributors, consultants, customs brokers, or joint venture partners. Due diligence on those parties should be proportionate to the risk, looking at ownership, ties to officials, whether compensation is reasonable, and whether the services are real. Contracts can include audit rights and anti-bribery commitments, but those terms do little unless someone follows up when red flags appear. Unusual payment requests, such as payments to an offshore account or to a different entity than the one under contract, deserve a pause and a question.

Keeping the program current

Federal enforcement priorities in this area have shifted recently, and current Justice Department guidance should be checked rather than assumed. Whatever the federal posture, state laws, foreign laws, and contractual obligations to customers and lenders continue to apply, and enforcement attention can change with little notice. A periodic review should test whether the controls match how the business actually operates today, including new markets and sales channels. We can review policies, train staff on realistic scenarios, and help design an escalation path for questions. If a concern has already surfaced, the response becomes an investigation question rather than a compliance one.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about bribery compliance and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.