Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Business Fraud Litigation

A deal partner misstated revenue, a seller hid liabilities, or a former officer diverted customers to a new company. Or you are on the receiving end of a complaint that labels an ordinary deal dispute as fraud.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Business Fraud Litigation: what usually happens

Fraud claim or contract claim

Business fraud litigation often starts with a deal that went bad, and the first question is whether the facts really support fraud or only a breach of contract. New York courts generally dismiss fraud claims that simply restate a broken contractual promise; the fraud usually has to involve a misrepresentation of present fact that induced the deal, or a duty separate from the contract. Fraud must also be pleaded with particularity, so the complaint has to identify the specific statements and the circumstances in which they were made. Sophisticated parties who signed contracts with specific disclaimers of reliance may find their fraud claims limited. These rules cut both ways: they shape how a plaintiff drafts the complaint and give defendants their earliest motion.

Moving early to protect the money

When funds have been diverted, speed can matter more than the polish of the complaint. Courts can grant provisional relief, such as orders of attachment or preliminary injunctions, but they require a strong showing and, for attachment, usually a bond. Forensic accounting can trace where money went and support those applications. Preserve email, chat platforms, accounting systems, and deal files, and issue a hold notice to employees who handled the relationship. On the defense side, preservation is just as important, and deleting anything once litigation is foreseeable can lead to sanctions that overshadow the merits.

Choosing the forum and the strategy

Many commercial disputes in New York are heard in the Commercial Division of the state Supreme Court, which has its own rules and pace; others belong in federal court or in arbitration under the contract. Fraud claims in New York have a limitations period with a discovery component, but it does not run forever, so delay can still close the door. Claims can sometimes be pursued against individual officers, not only the company, depending on their personal role. Our first review looks at the contract terms, the timeline of statements and payments, and whether criminal referrals or regulatory complaints are likely to run alongside the civil case.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about business fraud litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.