Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Medical

Clinical Trial Agreements

A sponsor has selected the site, the protocol is final, and now a long contract stands between the research team and the first enrolled participant.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Clinical Trial Agreements: what usually happens

Who is at the table

Clinical trial agreements are usually signed by the sponsor or a contract research organization acting for it, the research institution, and sometimes the principal investigator. The roles matter, because a CRO's authority to bind the sponsor depends on its own contract with the sponsor, and investigators may carry obligations of their own. Academic medical centers often hold standard positions shaped by their policies and their duties to participants. Sponsors negotiate with many sites at once and want consistency across them. Understanding the other side's constraints tends to shorten the negotiation. Where a site has an existing master agreement with a sponsor, the study-specific terms may be narrower than a first-time negotiation.

Terms that tend to draw negotiation

Who covers the cost of research-related injuries to participants is frequently debated, and the answer has to be consistent with what the informed consent form tells participants. Indemnification and insurance terms decide who bears the cost of claims, and they often turn on whether a problem came from the protocol or from the site's own conduct. Academic sites usually insist on the ability to publish results after a review period, while sponsors seek to protect confidential information and patent opportunities. Ownership of data and inventions arising from the study is another common sticking point. Budgets and payment schedules, including payment for participants who screen out, deserve their own review.

Getting to signature

For a site, we review the agreement against institutional policies, the consent form, and the budget, so that the documents tell the same story. For a sponsor, we focus on consistency across sites and on protecting data and intellectual property. Privacy obligations for participant data, including HIPAA authorizations and, for studies abroad, foreign data protection rules, should be addressed in the agreement itself. Slow contracting delays enrollment, so we identify early which points truly matter. We then put the negotiating effort where it is worth the time.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about clinical trial agreements and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.