Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Computer Fraud

A former employer says you logged in after you left, a company claims you scraped its site, or an investigator asks about files copied from a network the week before you resigned. Computer fraud claims usually begin with a dispute about access.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Computer Fraud: what usually happens

Authorization is usually the question

The federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and New York's own computer crime laws, center on accessing a computer without authorization or beyond it. The Supreme Court has read the federal law narrowly for people who misuse access they already had, so the question often turns on whether you were permitted into that part of the system at all, rather than on your reasons. Using a former colleague's password, logging in after access was revoked, or getting around a technical barrier tend to be treated differently from misusing data you were allowed to see. The same law also gives companies a civil claim, so a computer fraud dispute may arrive as a lawsuit rather than a charge. Contract terms, employment agreements, and trade secret claims frequently travel with it.

Leaving devices and accounts alone

Do not delete files, wipe a laptop, clear browser history, or close accounts once you know a dispute exists, even if the material seems harmless. Deleting evidence can create an obstruction or spoliation problem larger than the original claim. If you still hold company devices or data, ask counsel how to return them in a way that is documented, rather than sending them back on your own. Keep copies of your employment agreement, any access policies you were given, and messages showing what you were allowed to do. Do not log in to the systems again to check what you did.

What we sort out first

Early on we try to learn whether this is a criminal investigation, a civil claim, or both, and who is behind it. We look at what access you had, when it ended, and how that was communicated to you. If a demand letter or a court order requires you to return or preserve data, we deal with those obligations first, because missing one can harm you. We also consider whether the claim is really a business or employment dispute that the computer fraud allegation is meant to strengthen. That understanding shapes whether the next step is negotiation, a response in court, or a careful conversation with investigators.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about computer fraud and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.