Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Digital Evidence

Cybersecurity and Data Privacy

In many companies, security belongs to the technology group and privacy belongs to legal. Regulators and courts tend to look at both at once, usually right after something has gone wrong.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Cybersecurity and Data Privacy: what usually happens

Security as a legal duty

Privacy law asks not only what a company collects and shares but also whether the information was protected. New York's SHIELD Act requires businesses holding private information about New York residents to maintain reasonable safeguards, and the Federal Trade Commission has long treated poor data security as an unfair practice. Sector rules for health and financial information add their own security requirements. The word reasonable carries much of the weight in these laws, and what it means depends heavily on the size of the business and the sensitivity of the data it holds. That judgment is made in hindsight, which is why a record of security decisions matters. Encryption, access logging, and timely patching are the kinds of measures regulators tend to ask about first after an incident.

Where the two programs meet

Data minimization is a privacy principle and a security control at the same time, since information that was never kept cannot be stolen. Access controls, retention schedules, and vendor reviews similarly belong to both teams. The handoff that fails most often comes when a security event touches personal information and the security team's incident process has to run alongside the legal team's notification analysis. Companies that keep the functions in separate silos often discover mid-incident that they have two inventories of the same data, and neither is complete.

A combined review

We usually look at cybersecurity and data privacy together because the questions overlap: what data the company holds, which laws apply because of whose data it is, what safeguards exist, and what the company has promised publicly. Statements about security in privacy policies, sales materials, or customer questionnaires are an often-overlooked source of exposure, since they can be measured against reality after an incident. Our first step is generally to compare those promises with the actual controls and data map. From there we recommend where the programs should share ownership and where they can reasonably stay separate.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about cybersecurity and data privacy and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.