Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Divisional Patent Applications

The examiner says your application claims more than one invention and asks you to pick one. Divisional patent applications are how the claims you set aside can still be pursued, but only if they are filed at the right time.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Divisional Patent Applications: what usually happens

Why divisionals arise

In US practice, an examiner may issue a restriction requirement when an application claims independent or distinct inventions, such as a product and an unrelated method of using it. The applicant elects one group to continue examining, and the others are withdrawn from that application. A divisional application lets the applicant pursue the withdrawn claims, relying on the parent's filing date. Applicants can also file divisionals voluntarily, though the protections described below generally apply when the divisional follows a restriction.

Timing, term, and double patenting

A divisional must be filed while the parent application is still pending, so the window closes when the parent issues or is abandoned. Patent term is measured from the earliest nonprovisional filing date in the chain, so a divisional does not extend protection beyond the parent's family term, though term adjustments can differ. Federal law shields divisionals filed as a result of a restriction requirement from certain double patenting rejections based on the parent, which is one reason the distinction between a divisional and an ordinary continuation matters. Practice abroad differs, and the European Patent Office, for instance, has its own divisional rules and fee structure. Continuation-in-part applications, which add new matter, are a different tool and do not carry the same protection.

Fitting divisionals into the plan

Not every withdrawn claim set is worth a separate application, since each one adds fees, prosecution work, and maintenance costs. The decision usually turns on whether the withdrawn inventions cover something competitors use or are likely to use. Bring the restriction requirement, the claims in each group, and a note of which products or competitors each group relates to. Divisional filings are prepared and prosecuted by registered patent practitioners. A first review typically sets which claims to elect, which to file as divisionals, and the date by which they must be filed. Waiting until the parent is about to issue leaves little room for error.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about divisional patent applications and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.