Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Employee Embezzlement

The numbers stopped adding up, you traced a set of transfers or refunds back to someone you trusted, and now you are deciding whether to confront them, fire them, call the police, or all of the above.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Employee Embezzlement: what usually happens

Patterns owners tend to find

Employee embezzlement in small and mid-sized businesses often runs through ordinary systems: refunds issued to the employee's own card, vendors that do not exist, payroll entries for people who no longer work there, or cash deposits that come up short. It frequently continues for a long time because the person handling the money is also the person reconciling it. Discovering it can feel urgent, but the first moves determine how much can later be proven and recovered. A quick confrontation sometimes gives the person time to delete records or move money. Whether to suspend access first, and how, is worth deciding with counsel.

Secure the books and give notice

Preserve the accounting system as it is, along with bank statements, payroll exports, and the employee's work email and devices, and do not let anyone clean up or correct entries in the meantime. A forensic accountant can trace the losses in a way that will hold up later, which matters both for a police report and for a civil claim. Review your insurance as well, because many businesses carry crime or employee dishonesty coverage, and those policies often have notice and proof-of-loss requirements on a set timetable. Tell your bank promptly about any unauthorized transactions. If a written timeline of who knew what would help, prepare it at your lawyer's direction.

Repayment, reporting, and the order of moves

Many employers want the money back more than they want a prosecution. Negotiating repayment is possible, but tying it to a promise not to go to the police can raise legal problems of its own, so the terms need care. Reporting to law enforcement is your decision, though prosecutors then control the criminal case, and a restitution order in that case is not the same as collecting the money. A civil suit can seek recovery and, in some cases, an order freezing assets, but its value depends on what the person actually has. Our first meeting with an employer usually covers the size and proof of the loss, the insurance available, and which path or combination of paths fits your goals.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about employee embezzlement and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.