Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Employee Expense Fraud

Human resources called you in to go over a stack of expense reports: meals, mileage, a hotel night, charges on the corporate card. They want an explanation today, and they have a repayment form ready.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Employee Expense Fraud: what usually happens

How these cases usually begin

Employee expense fraud reviews often start with an automated audit flag, a manager's review, or a tip from a coworker. Typical issues include personal purchases on a company card, duplicate submissions, inflated mileage, and receipts that appear altered. Many situations sit in a gray zone, such as unclear policies, approvals a supervisor gave verbally, or practices that were widely tolerated until suddenly they were not. The company's main goals are usually to stop the loss and recover the money, but referral to police or prosecutors does happen, particularly when amounts are larger or receipts were fabricated.

Before you sign or repay

Statements and repayment agreements signed in the first meeting are often treated later as admissions, and they can be shared with law enforcement. Asking for time to review the documents and consult a lawyer is reasonable. New York restricts the deductions employers can take from wages, so an informal plan to take repayment out of your paycheck raises its own legal questions. If you are terminated, the stated reason can affect unemployment insurance and future references, which is another reason to be careful about what you sign. Keep copies of your own messages and approvals, but ask before copying company files or logging into expense systems.

Explaining the record

A credible explanation usually comes from the documents: the written expense policy, emails approving particular charges, travel itineraries, and patterns showing how others in your role submitted similar expenses. A lawyer can help you assemble that record and decide whether, when, and how to respond to the employer. If a criminal referral looks likely, the strategy shifts toward protecting your rights rather than resolving things informally. Totals built from many small charges over a long stretch deserve a line-by-line check, because the employer's figure is not always accurate. In an early conversation we look at the amount in question, what the company has shown you, and what you have already said or signed.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about employee expense fraud and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.