Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Administrative

Environmental Enforcement Defense

Most environmental violations are resolved administratively, but some escalate to a hearing, a civil lawsuit brought by the government, or an investigation into whether someone acted knowingly.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Environmental Enforcement Defense: what usually happens

How a matter escalates

If negotiations with the agency break down, a state matter can proceed to an administrative hearing, and federal matters may be referred to the Justice Department for a civil lawsuit. Criminal enforcement is less common but real, and several environmental statutes make knowing violations a crime, which can reach individual managers as well as the company. Search warrants, interviews by agents rather than inspectors, and grand jury subpoenas are signs that a matter may be moving in that direction. When that happens, the defense strategy changes, and the interests of the company and of individual employees may diverge.

Preserving evidence without making it worse

Put a written hold in place on records relating to the issue and suspend routine deletion. Do not alter logs, monitoring data, or reports without counsel's guidance, even to correct what looks like an obvious error, since changes made after an investigation begins can look like concealment. If the agency takes samples, ask about collecting split samples so your own laboratory can test them. Equipment and site conditions should be documented as they are before repairs, where safety allows. Employees should know they may have a lawyer present for interviews.

Building the defense

Defenses in these cases often turn on technical questions, such as whether a sampling method was valid, whether a permit actually covered the activity, or whether a condition came from another source. Some disputes concern the law itself, including whether a particular waterbody or material falls under the statute at all. We work with technical consultants to test the agency's findings and with you to understand the operational history. When individual exposure is possible, we discuss whether certain employees need separate counsel. The first meeting establishes what stage the matter has reached and what should not be done while the facts are gathered. Public statements or messages to customers about the cause are usually better held until those facts are clearer.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about environmental enforcement defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.