Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

False Advertising Lawsuit

A rival's ad says its product does what yours does, only better, and the claim is not true. Or your own marketing has drawn a demand letter or a class complaint. A false advertising lawsuit can arrive from either direction.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

False Advertising Lawsuit: what usually happens

Two kinds of plaintiff

Competitors usually sue under the federal Lanham Act, which lets a business harmed in its sales or commercial reputation challenge a rival's false or misleading statements about goods or services. Consumers generally cannot use that statute. They tend to rely on state consumer protection law instead, and in New York the General Business Law provisions on deceptive practices and false advertising are the usual vehicle, often in a proposed class action. The Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general also police advertising, although the FTC Act itself does not give private parties a right to sue. Which kind of case you face shapes what has to be proven and what is at stake.

False on its face, or misleading in context

Courts commonly separate claims that are literally false from claims that are technically accurate but leave a misleading impression. A statement that is false on its face is usually easier to challenge. A misleading claim often requires evidence of how buyers actually understood it, and consumer surveys become a frequent battleground. Comparative claims, claims that testing proves something, and labels like "natural" draw a large share of disputes. General boasting that no reasonable buyer would take as a measurable fact, often called puffery, is usually not actionable, although where puffery ends is argued case by case.

Opening moves on each side

If you are challenging an ad, we look at what substantiation the advertiser is likely to have, what evidence of harm to your sales exists, and whether the advertising self-regulatory process run by BBB National Programs would move faster than a court. If your advertising is the target, we start with the substantiation file: the testing, studies, or data that existed when the claim first ran. Preserve the drafts, approvals, and test results behind the campaign. Changing a challenged claim can be a sensible step, but do it deliberately and keep the earlier versions. Delay matters in both directions, because a request for an injunction loses force when the party seeking it has waited.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about false advertising lawsuit and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.