Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Fraud Due Diligence

Before you buy a company, invest in a fund, sign a distributor, or lend against someone's financial statements, the question is not only whether the deal makes sense but whether the people and the numbers behind it are what they claim to be.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Fraud Due Diligence: what usually happens

When the effort pays off

Fraud due diligence is most useful where you are relying heavily on information the other side controls, such as unaudited financials, customer lists, revenue that is hard to verify, or a founder's track record. Red flags often show up as small inconsistencies rather than dramatic findings: revenue concentrated in related parties, a history of changing auditors, litigation that was settled quietly, or entities that exist mostly on paper. Sectors with heavy government reimbursement, cross-border payments, or cash-intensive operations generally call for closer work. The level of effort should match the size of the risk, and a modest deal does not need the review a large acquisition would.

Sources and methods

Typical work combines public-record searches, court and regulatory filings, corporate registry checks in each jurisdiction involved, and a closer look at the financial statements, sometimes with a forensic accountant. Interviews with management and, where appropriate, former employees or customers can surface things that documents do not. Background research has legal limits of its own: pretexting and obtaining certain financial or telephone records are restricted, and some kinds of consumer reports are regulated, so investigators need to stay within those lines. Keep the results organized and dated, because what you knew at signing can matter if a dispute arises afterward.

Turning findings into protection

Diligence findings are only valuable if they change the deal. Depending on what turns up, that can mean walking away, adjusting price, requiring specific representations, holding back part of the payment, or carving fraud out of the contractual limits on liability. New York courts generally enforce specific disclaimers of reliance between sophisticated parties, which is one reason the diligence record and the contract language need to be read together. When we are brought in, we usually sit down with the deal team to identify where the real exposure lies, which questions need answers before signing, and how unresolved concerns will be handled in the documents.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about fraud due diligence and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.