Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Administrative

Government Enforcement Defense

An inspector general's subpoena asks for years of billing records, a contracting officer refers an audit finding for review, or a civil investigative demand arrives citing the False Claims Act.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Government Enforcement Defense: what usually happens

How contractors come under scrutiny

Companies that do business with the government face enforcement tools that private businesses rarely see. Contract audits can question pricing, labor charges, or cost allocations. Inspectors general can issue subpoenas for records. The Justice Department and state attorneys general use civil investigative demands in False Claims Act matters, many of which begin when an insider files a whistleblower suit that stays under seal while the government investigates, so the company may not know a case exists. New York has its own false claims statute that reaches state and local funds. Government enforcement defense often begins long before any complaint is public.

Suspension, debarment, and disclosure

Separately from any lawsuit, agency officials can suspend or debar a contractor from future government work, and a suspension can be imposed during an investigation, before anything has been proved. For many companies that is the most serious immediate risk, and the process allows a chance to present information showing the company is presently responsible, including remedial steps it has taken. Federal contractors also have a duty to disclose credible evidence of certain violations connected to their contracts, and failing to disclose can itself be a ground for exclusion. Deciding whether and how to make a disclosure is a judgment that should be made with counsel.

Organizing the defense

Issue a document hold that covers email, timekeeping, billing systems, and personal devices used for work. Do not take adverse action against an employee suspected of reporting concerns, since anti-retaliation protections apply. Identify who will speak with investigators and whether individual employees need separate counsel. We review the demand or subpoena, negotiate its scope where possible, and look at the contract terms and billing practices at issue to understand the theory the government may be pursuing. We also consider how a civil, criminal, or administrative track may develop, so that a response in one does not undermine the others.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about government enforcement defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.