Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Tax & Customs

Import Fraud

Customs asks for information about the value of a shipment, a competitor files a sealed whistleblower suit, or an agent wants to talk about where your goods were really made. Import fraud cases often begin quietly and grow from a single entry into years of records.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Import Fraud: what usually happens

How import cases tend to start

Most import fraud allegations involve how goods were described at entry, usually their value, their classification, or their country of origin. Routing goods through a third country to avoid duties or antidumping orders is a frequent focus, as are invoices that understate what the buyer actually paid. U.S. Customs and Border Protection can open an inquiry through a request for information, an audit, or a penalty notice, and some matters are referred to Homeland Security Investigations or prosecutors. Competitors and former employees increasingly bring whistleblower suits under the False Claims Act, which the Justice Department can join. Tariff rules have also changed sharply, including court rulings on certain tariffs, so the duties that applied to a particular entry need to be confirmed.

Getting your import records in order

Gather entry documents, commercial invoices, purchase orders, payment records, and your communications with suppliers and customs brokers. Check whether the information your broker filed matches what you actually paid and where the goods were actually manufactured. Preserve email and messaging accounts used to deal with suppliers, including any on personal phones. Do not ask suppliers to issue new or revised invoices for past shipments. If you discover errors before CBP raises them, a formal disclosure process exists that can reduce penalties, but it has strict requirements and its timing matters.

What we sort through first

Our first step is identifying which agency is involved and whether the matter is civil, criminal, or both. Customs penalties depend heavily on the level of culpability the government can show, so the facts about who knew what, and when, carry real weight. We review your entries and compare them against the records that support them. If a whistleblower suit is suspected, we explain how those cases proceed and what to expect if the government intervenes. We also look at whether brokers, suppliers, or affiliates should have separate counsel.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about import fraud and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.