Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation

A software implementation failed and the vendor says the problem is your data, while your developers suspect the vendor reused your code. Intellectual property and technology litigation tends to blend several legal theories, and the way they are combined shapes the whole case.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Intellectual Property and Technology Litigation: what usually happens

Why these cases overlap

Technology disputes rarely fit one category. A failed software project can raise breach of contract and warranty claims alongside copyright or trade secret claims. A former partner's competing product can involve patent infringement and misappropriation together. Data scraping and unauthorized system access raise questions under federal and state computer misuse laws, which courts have read more narrowly in recent years. License disputes often turn on whether a use exceeded the scope of a grant, which can be pleaded as breach, infringement, or both.

Where the case is heard

Patent and copyright claims arising under federal law belong in federal court, while trademark, trade secret, and contract claims can often be heard in state or federal court. In New York, the Commercial Division of the state Supreme Court handles many complex business and technology contract disputes. Arbitration clauses in licenses and service agreements frequently send part or all of a dispute out of court. The choice of forum affects discovery, schedule, and the kind of decision maker who will evaluate the technology. Appeals in cases with patent claims generally go to the Federal Circuit, while other federal cases go to the regional courts of appeals, which can influence how claims are pleaded.

Preparing for a technology dispute

Technical proof drives these cases. Preserve source code repositories with their history, ticketing systems, project documentation, change logs, and communications, and suspend routine deletion. Identify the people who understand the system and are likely to be witnesses. Bring the relevant contracts, statements of work, license terms, and a short technical description of what went wrong. Early on, independent technical consultants often help test the theory before it is pleaded. A first meeting usually sorts out which claims are strongest, where they must be brought, and what needs to be preserved immediately. Requests to stop ongoing use of code or data often come early, and they depend on evidence assembled quickly.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about intellectual property and technology litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.