Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Disputes

A co-founder left and took the code. A former contractor says the designs are still theirs. A competitor's name is close to yours. Many intellectual property disputes are really fights about contracts, ownership, and timing.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Intellectual Property Disputes: what usually happens

Ownership fights are common

A large share of intellectual property disputes are not about copying by a stranger but about who owns the asset in the first place. Founders who built technology before incorporation, contractors who never signed an assignment, joint venture partners with vague agreements, and employees whose agreements promise to assign rather than presently assign can all leave ownership open to argument. These disputes can turn on contract law as much as on IP law. Some of them can be heard in state court, while claims arising under federal patent or copyright law belong in federal court.

Before it becomes a lawsuit

Most disputes start with a letter. A demand that asserts infringement and threatens suit can allow the recipient to file first, asking a court in a location it prefers to declare that it does not infringe. Receiving one calls for a measured reply, neither silence nor an angry email. Marketplace complaints, domain name proceedings, and platform takedowns offer faster pressure points, and mediation is often used once both sides understand their exposure. Preserve emails, drafts, version histories, contracts, and payment records from the start.

Mapping the dispute

We start by identifying which rights are actually in play, whether patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret, or contract, because each comes with different proof, remedies, and forums. We then look at what the other side really wants: money, a license, a name change, or the asset back. In a first conversation we also ask about deadlines you may already be facing, such as a response date on a complaint or a trademark proceeding, and about insurance that could respond.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about intellectual property disputes and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.