Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

IP Litigation

Executives are often surprised less by the legal arguments in IP litigation than by what the case asks of the business itself — the documents, the witnesses, and the months of attention it pulls from people who have other jobs.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

IP Litigation: what usually happens

Where these cases are heard

Patent and copyright cases belong to the federal courts, which have exclusive authority over them. Trademark and trade secret claims can be brought in federal or state court, and they often end up in federal court alongside other claims. Patent appeals go to a dedicated federal appeals court in Washington, while most other IP appeals go to the regional circuit, which for New York is the Second Circuit. Related proceedings may run in parallel at the USPTO, such as validity challenges before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or oppositions and cancellations before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Those proceedings can affect the timing of the court case and sometimes pause it.

What discovery asks of the business

After the pleadings, most of the work happens in discovery. Each side exchanges documents, email, source code or design files, and financial records, and the people who created and sold the product may be questioned under oath. Confidential material is usually handled under a protective order that limits who can see sensitive files, but it still has to be collected, reviewed, and produced. Technical and damages issues are usually explained by retained witnesses, whose work can be one of the larger costs of the case. Issuing a litigation hold early, and making sure routine deletion actually stops, belongs among the first steps.

Planning for the arc of the case

Many IP cases turn at points well before trial: a ruling on a preliminary injunction, a court's interpretation of disputed claim terms, or a summary judgment decision. Settlement often takes the form of a license, a redesign, or an agreed transition period rather than a simple payment. We help clients map the likely phases, set a realistic budget for each, and identify who inside the company will carry the burden. As rulings come in, we revisit the strategy with you rather than holding to a plan the case has outgrown. Clear internal decision-making often matters as much as the legal arguments in keeping the case under control.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about IP litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.