Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

IP & Tech Valuation

Two sides look at the same patent portfolio, software platform, or trademark and arrive at numbers that are not remotely close, and the gap now sits at the center of a lawsuit or a deal.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

IP & Tech Valuation: what usually happens

When value becomes the dispute

IP and tech valuation becomes a legal question in more settings than people expect. In patent infringement cases, damages often turn on what a reasonable royalty would have been in a hypothetical negotiation between the parties. Trade secret and contract disputes can require putting a value on technology that was taken or on a deal that fell through. Outside infringement cases, valuation drives disputes over earn-outs after an acquisition, the division of a business in a divorce, transfers of IP between related companies across borders, and collateral in a financing. Each setting applies its own standards, and a figure built for one purpose rarely carries over to another without adjustment.

Material the valuation will rest on

A defensible valuation is built on documents, not adjectives. Licensing agreements involving the same or comparable technology, development costs, revenue and margin data tied to products that use the IP, and internal forecasts all tend to be requested. Prior offers to buy or license the technology and earlier valuations prepared for financing or tax purposes often surface in discovery, so it helps to know early what they say. Patent and registration records, maintenance history, and any challenges to validity affect what the asset is worth. Internal emails speculating about value can be requested too, so talk with counsel before circulating new estimates.

Working alongside valuation professionals

Lawyers do not produce the valuation; retained valuation professionals and economists do, and courts scrutinize their methods closely before letting their opinions reach a jury. Our role is to frame the legal standard that applies, test whether the method fits it, and make sure the underlying data can be authenticated and explained. In an early conversation we sort out which setting you are in, which standard governs, and which records already exist. We also discuss timing, since retained witnesses usually need to be engaged well before reports are due. You should leave knowing which questions the valuation must answer.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about IP & tech valuation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.