Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Liability for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

The demand letter names the engineer who left, but it also names the company that hired her and two of its managers. Liability for misappropriation of trade secrets rarely stops with one person, and how far it reaches depends on what each party knew and did.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Liability for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets: what usually happens

Whose conduct is on the line

The person who took or used the information is the obvious target, but exposure often extends further. A business that receives confidential material can face claims if it knew or had reason to know the information arrived through improper means or in breach of a duty of confidence. Managers who directed or encouraged the use may be named personally. Federal law, through the Defend Trade Secrets Act, gives owners a claim in federal court, and state law runs alongside it. New York has not adopted the uniform trade secrets statute that most states use, so claims under New York law rest largely on court decisions, which is one reason the analysis there can differ from a neighboring state.

How exposure is measured

Courts usually look first at whether to stop ongoing use, through an injunction, and then at money. Monetary relief is commonly framed around the owner's loss or the other side's gain, and some courts use a reasonable royalty when neither can be measured well. Where the conduct is found willful and malicious, federal law allows additional damages and, in some circumstances, attorney's fees. Fee shifting can also run the other way when a claim is brought in bad faith. Which measures are realistic in a given matter depends heavily on the evidence of use, not just of taking, and on the forum.

Sorting out your own position

If you are the owner, we start with what the secret actually is, how it was protected, and what proof shows it was used rather than merely copied. If you are an accused individual or a hiring company, the early questions are what came in the door, who touched it, and whether it has been quarantined in a way that can be documented. Do not delete or return material on your own, because how it is handled can become part of the case. Bring the relevant employment and confidentiality agreements, any correspondence about the departure, and a list of people involved. A first meeting usually decides whether an early resolution, such as a forensic return protocol, is worth proposing before positions harden.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about liability for misappropriation of trade secrets and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.