Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Mail Fraud

A visit from a postal inspector, a search of an office that sends bulk mailings, a subpoena to a shipping account — mail fraud cases tend to begin with the paper trail a business leaves behind.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Mail Fraud: what usually happens

Why the mail still matters

Mail fraud is the older sibling of wire fraud: a federal charge for a scheme to defraud that used the Postal Service or a private interstate carrier somewhere along the way. The mailing does not need to contain the false statement itself; a check, an invoice, or a product shipment sent as part of the scheme can be enough. Cases often involve sweepstakes and prize notices, fake invoices sent to businesses, mail-order products that did not perform as promised, and schemes aimed at older people. The U.S. Postal Inspection Service is the main investigating agency, though other agencies often join. As with wire fraud, the dispute usually centers on intent and on whether statements were materially false.

Records a mailing business should keep intact

If your business sends mail or ships products, the government will often look at the materials themselves: the mailers, scripts, product claims, and customer complaints. Keep copies of every version of your marketing, records showing who approved the wording, refund and complaint logs, and contracts with mail houses or list brokers. Do not delete records or alter materials already sent, and make decisions about pausing or revising a campaign with counsel. Employees who wrote copy or handled complaints may be contacted, and some may need their own lawyer. If inspectors arrive with a warrant, do not obstruct the search, ask for a copy of the warrant, and call counsel.

Shaping the response

Early on we review what the government has asked for or taken, and we learn how the business operated: who designed the offers, how complaints were handled, and what customers actually received. We look at whether the matter could be resolved administratively or civilly, through the Postal Service, the FTC, or a state attorney general, or whether it is headed toward criminal charges. We also consider the individual exposure of owners and managers apart from the business itself. Then we set priorities for preserving records, dealing with banks and payment processors, and responding to investigators.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about mail fraud and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.