Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Cross-Border

National Security Agreement

CFIUS or the Team Telecom agencies have told you they are prepared to clear your transaction or license, but only with a national security agreement. The terms you negotiate now will govern daily operations long after closing.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

National Security Agreement: what usually happens

Where these agreements come from

A national security agreement is a binding mitigation agreement between a company and the U.S. government agencies that reviewed a foreign investment or a telecommunications license. In the CFIUS context, it resolves risks identified during the review of a transaction. For FCC licenses involving foreign ownership, a group of executive branch agencies informally known as Team Telecom can recommend that the license be conditioned on a similar agreement. Lighter instruments, such as letters of assurance, are used in some lower-risk situations. The agreement is usually negotiated under time pressure, because the review clock or the deal timetable is running.

Terms that commonly appear

Agreements often call for a security officer who is a U.S. citizen, limits on foreign access to certain data or systems, and notice or approval before changes in key suppliers or locations. Some require independent directors, or third-party auditors and monitors who report to the government. Each provision has an operating cost, and vague terms can be interpreted broadly later. The government has stepped up enforcement of mitigation agreements in recent years, including penalties for breaches, so the commitments must be ones the company can actually meet.

Negotiating and living with the agreement

We work with your business and technical teams to understand what each proposed term would require in practice, and we push back where a provision is broader than the identified risk. Reporting deadlines, approval processes, and audit rights should be mapped into a compliance calendar before signing. After closing, a clear internal owner, training for staff who handle sensitive data, and a process for reporting incidents to the agencies are usually essential. In a first conversation we review the draft or the agencies' stated concerns and identify which terms are worth negotiating hardest. We also consider how the agreement will affect future financings or a sale, since buyers and investors will read it closely.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about national security agreement and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.