Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Patent Dispute

A letter accuses your product of infringing a patent, or a competitor has launched something that looks a lot like your patented design. A patent dispute can travel through several forums, and the first choice often shapes the rest.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Patent Dispute: what usually happens

Where patent disputes are decided

Infringement claims are brought in federal district court, where a patent owner can seek damages and, in some cases, an order stopping the infringing activity. When accused goods are imported, a patent owner may also go to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which does not award money but can bar the goods from entering the country. On the other side, a party accused of infringement can ask the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to review whether certain claims should have issued, though such a petition generally has to be filed within a set period after an infringement complaint is served, and institution is at the USPTO's discretion. These tracks often run at the same time, and a ruling in one can affect the others.

What the dispute usually turns on

Two questions sit at the center of nearly every patent dispute: what the claims mean, and whether they are valid. The meaning of a claim's words is decided by the court, and that ruling frequently shapes how the rest of the case unfolds. Validity challenges typically rest on earlier patents, publications, or products that predate the patent's filing. Damages arguments come later but are shaped early, by the sales records that exist, any licensing history, and when the accused party learned of the patent. Preserve design files, product documentation, sales data, and correspondence about the patent or the party asserting it.

Choosing a response

Plenty of patent disputes never reach a courtroom. Many resolve through a license, a design change, or a negotiated covenant not to sue, and the realistic options depend on who owns the patent: a competitor that makes products, or an entity whose business is licensing. We look at whether the patent is in force, whether the party asserting it actually owns it, what the claims really reach, and what each path would cost. If you own the patent, we weigh the same questions from your side, including what evidence you can assemble that the other product actually falls within your claims before you raise the issue.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about patent dispute and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.