Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Patent Examiner

Somewhere at the USPTO, one patent examiner will largely decide what your application becomes. Most applicants never meet that person, but understanding how examiners work changes how a rejection reads.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Patent Examiner: what usually happens

Who the examiner is

Patent examiners are technically trained USPTO employees assigned to art units organized by subject matter, so the person reviewing a medical device will usually not be the one reviewing software. The examiner searches the prior art, compares it with your claims, and decides whether the claims clear the legal requirements for a patent, the most argued of which are novelty and obviousness. Examiners work under production expectations and with heavy dockets, which shapes how much time any single response receives. Practice also varies across art units, and some technology areas are known for being considerably harder to get through than others.

Reading an office action

A first rejection is common and is usually the opening of a negotiation rather than a verdict. The office action explains which references the examiner relies on and why, and sometimes points toward amendments that might be acceptable. A response can argue that the examiner has misread the references, amend the claims, or do some of each, and it has to be filed within the period the office sets. Anything you say in a response becomes part of the public file and can limit how broadly your patent is read later, so casual concessions tend to cost something down the line. Reading the action closely sometimes shows that the examiner's real objection is narrower than the rejection first appears.

Talking with the examiner

Interviews, usually by video or phone, are among the most useful tools in prosecution and are often overlooked by applicants filing on their own. A short conversation can clarify what the examiner actually objects to and what claim language might move the application forward. After a final rejection, the paths split: limited further amendment, a request for continued examination to keep working with the same examiner, or an appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Apart from inventors acting for themselves, only registered patent attorneys and agents may represent applicants in these exchanges. We review the file history and the examiner's record with you and help decide which route fits the claims you need.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about patent examiner and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.