Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Software Copyright

Your team wrote the code, but a contractor built the first version, an open-source library sits at its core, and a former partner says part of it is theirs. Software copyright questions usually begin with who owns what.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Software Copyright: what usually happens

What copyright reaches in code

Copyright protects the written expression in software, meaning the source and object code and some elements of its structure, from the moment it is fixed. It does not protect the underlying idea, the functionality, or methods of operation, so a competitor that writes its own code to do the same job is usually not infringing. Where there is no literal copying, disputes often turn on how much non-literal structure was taken and whether that structure reflects creative choices or was dictated by efficiency and outside constraints. Interfaces and similar elements have produced hard-fought cases with fact-specific results. For some features, a patent or trade secret protection fits better than copyright, and many companies rely on more than one.

Ownership is where problems hide

Code written by employees within the scope of their jobs generally belongs to the employer. Code written by independent contractors usually does not, unless there is a signed written assignment, because the categories of commissioned work that can be treated as made for hire are narrow and ordinary software rarely fits them. Open-source components bring license terms of their own, and some licenses attach conditions to distributing modified code. Investors and acquirers tend to check all of this in diligence. Gather your contractor agreements, employee invention assignment agreements, and an inventory of third-party and open-source components.

Registering and acting on copying

For works first published in the US, registration with the Copyright Office is generally required before filing an infringement suit, and registering earlier can affect which remedies are available. The Office accepts a deposit of selected portions of source code, and redacted deposits are possible when the code contains trade secrets. If you suspect copying, preserve the versions and commit history that show when your code was written, and do not try to access a competitor's systems to find out. With a software ownership question, we usually sort out ownership, registration status, and whether the issue is copying of code or something copyright does not reach.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about software copyright and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.