Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Tax & Customs

Trade Agreement

Your supplier in Korea says the goods qualify for duty-free treatment under the trade agreement, and your broker asks who will certify origin. The savings are real, but so is the responsibility for the claim.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Trade Agreement: what usually happens

What a trade agreement does for an importer

Free trade agreements such as the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement allow qualifying goods to enter at reduced or zero duty rates. Whether goods qualify depends on the agreement's rules of origin, which often look at where materials came from and how the product was transformed, not simply where it was shipped. The preference is usually claimed by the importer at entry, and some agreements also allow a claim after importation within a set period. Recent tariff measures imposed on other legal grounds have in many cases applied regardless of trade agreement status, and several have been changed or challenged, so their current reach should be confirmed. A trade agreement claim lowers ordinary duties; it does not answer every tariff question.

Supporting a preference claim

The importer generally must have a basis for the claim and be able to produce supporting records if Customs and Border Protection asks. That usually means a certification of origin from the importer, exporter, or producer, and documents behind it such as bills of materials, supplier statements, and production records. Exporters are sometimes asked to share cost and sourcing information they consider confidential, and some agreements allow that information to go directly to customs. The importer is generally expected to retain these records for a set period after entry. When the producer is abroad, the arrangement for verification should be settled before the first shipment.

When a claim is questioned

CBP can request information to verify origin and can deny the preference if the support is inadequate, which leads to duties owed plus interest and possibly penalties. A denial also tends to prompt review of other entries of the same product. If you discover a past claim was wrong, a correction or a prior disclosure may reduce exposure, depending on timing. If you have a commercial contract dispute with a trading partner rather than a customs question, the issues are different and we address them separately. In a first meeting we review the product, its sourcing, and the documents behind your preference claims.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about trade agreement and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.