Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Trade Secret Litigation

The departing engineer downloaded the customer list, or the new hire's laptop holds files from a former employer. Trade secret litigation usually starts with a moment like that, and what happens in the next few days matters.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Trade Secret Litigation: what usually happens

What the owner has to show

A trade secret claim generally turns on two questions: whether the information was valuable because it was kept confidential and protected with reasonable measures, and whether the other side obtained or used it improperly. Claims can be brought under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act or under state law, and New York relies on its own common law rather than the uniform act most states have adopted. Courts often require the owner to identify the secrets with some specificity early in the case. General skills and knowledge an employee picks up on the job usually are not treated as the employer's secret.

Collecting evidence without creating new problems

Forensic imaging of company devices and review of company email and access logs can show what was taken and when. Owners should not access a former employee's personal accounts or devices without legal authority, as that can create claims against the company. Employees who are accused should not delete files or wipe devices, which can be treated as destruction of evidence; instead, they should preserve everything and get advice about returning material. A litigation hold should go out early on both sides. Companies should also look at how the departing employee's access was handled, because evidence of reasonable protective measures is part of the owner's own case.

Urgent relief and the shape of the case

Many cases begin with a request for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction to stop use of the information or require its return. The federal statute also allows seizure orders in extraordinary circumstances, though courts grant them rarely. Restrictive covenants in an employment agreement often run alongside the trade secret claim. Cases frequently resolve with agreed forensic return and deletion protocols, limits on certain activities, and sometimes payments. Whether you are the company or the individual accused, the early decisions about what to preserve, what to return, and what to ask a court for tend to matter most.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about trade secret litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.