Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Trademark Due Diligence

You are about to buy a company whose main asset is its brand. Trademark due diligence answers a simple question that often has a complicated answer: does the seller actually own the marks it is selling, everywhere it says it does?

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Trademark Due Diligence: what usually happens

Ownership and title

Diligence starts with the records. Registrations and applications should stand in the seller's name, and assignment history should be recorded with the USPTO and with foreign offices where relevant. Marks are often held by a founder personally, a former subsidiary, or a distributor abroad rather than the operating company. Applications filed on an intent-to-use basis carry a particular restriction: they generally cannot be assigned before use is shown, apart from a narrow exception for transfers of the related business. Gaps can usually be cured before closing if found early. Searches of state registrations and common-law use can also reveal earlier users with local rights that a federal registration does not override.

Strength and vulnerabilities

A registration that is old but no longer used for some listed goods may be vulnerable to cancellation for those goods. Pending oppositions, cancellation actions, demand letters, and litigation should be disclosed and reviewed. Licenses granted by the seller, coexistence agreements, and consent agreements can limit how the buyer may expand the brand. Searches for similar marks in the target's markets help judge whether the brand can grow into new products or territories. Domain names and social media handles are often overlooked but practically important. If the target relies on unregistered marks, the review shifts toward evidence of use and any conflicting registrations owned by others.

Coordinating with the deal

Findings feed into the purchase agreement, often as representations, specific indemnities, or closing conditions. Bring the target's trademark list, any disclosure schedules, license and coexistence agreements, and information about where the business sells or plans to sell. We review the records, flag what needs fixing before signing, and outline what can wait until after closing. A first meeting usually sets the scope of the review in proportion to the size of the deal and the role the brand plays in it. Where the brand is sold online, marketplace brand-registry accounts and their administrators should be identified so control transfers cleanly at closing.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about trademark due diligence and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.