Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Trademark Infringement

Customers start calling the wrong company, a review meant for a competitor lands on your page, or a supplier asks whether you have opened a second location. Moments like these are often the first sign of a trademark problem.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Trademark Infringement: what usually happens

Confusion is the center of it

Trademark infringement usually turns on whether the other side's use is likely to confuse buyers about who is behind the goods or services, or about whether the two businesses are connected. Courts weigh a number of considerations, and federal courts in New York follow a long-established set of factors rather than a single test. How similar the marks are and how close the products sit in the market tend to carry the most weight, but no one factor settles it. Registration helps, though an unregistered mark can also be protected where it has been used and is recognized. A mark that merely describes the product is harder to enforce unless buyers have come to see it as a brand.

Evidence worth collecting now

Instances of actual confusion are among the most persuasive material in these disputes, and they are easy to lose. Save misdirected emails, calls logged by your staff, mistaken reviews, and social media comments, noting dates and who was involved. Document how and where the other mark appears, including packaging, listings, and advertising. Pull together your own history of use: when you started, where you sell, what you have spent building recognition, and any press coverage. Keep your team from contacting the other business on their own initiative, because informal exchanges can muddy the record or start the dispute on the wrong footing.

Why timing matters

Owners sometimes wait to see whether the other business fades away. A long delay can weaken a request for quick court relief and, in some cases, support an argument that you accepted the use. Early steps vary with the situation: a letter, a marketplace complaint, an opposition or cancellation at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board if the other side has filed or registered, or a lawsuit when the harm is serious. Each signals something different about how firmly you intend to protect the brand. We look at how strong your rights are, how much confusion is really happening, and which response fits the size of the problem before any letter goes out.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about trademark infringement and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.