Go to integrated search

How Can a Health Care Lawyer Review Clinic Ownership in New York?

Practice Area:Corporate
Jurisdiction:New York

A health care lawyer can assess whether a New York clinic's ownership and investor control comply with professional practice rules.

Management agreements may raise separate concerns when outsiders influence clinical decisions or receive fees tied to practice revenue. Licensing and facility approvals depend on the clinic's legal structure and operations. Before signing, physicians should examine governance rights, provider contracts, and management terms.



1. Clinic Ownership Requires Eligible Owners and Genuine Control


Ownership records do not reveal who runs a practice. Voting rights and daily decisions may tell a different story.


Ownership Requirements for Professional Corporations and Pllcs

Business Corporation Law §§ 1507–1508 restrict professional corporation shareholders, directors, and officers to qualifying licensed professionals. For a medical professional limited liability company (PLLC), Limited Liability Company Law § 1207(b) requires each member to hold a license to practice medicine in the state.

Section 1207(c) bars transferring voting authority to ineligible persons. Ordinary LLC registration does not authorize medical practice. Entity selection is covered in healthcare entity formation.

Investor Rights That May Constitute Actual Control

An investor may lack shares yet gain control through bank access, leases, appointments, or vetoes. Examine clinical staffing, spending, and patient-care authority. Financial oversight alone does not establish unlawful control.

In Andrew Carothers, M.D., P.C. v. Progressive Insurance Co., 33 N.Y.3d 389 (2019), the Court of Appeals upheld a finding of improper nonphysician control despite nominal physician ownership. The no-fault reimbursement case illustrates why post-formation control matters.


2. Management Agreements Must Respect Professional Independence


A management services organization (MSO) may provide support, but healthcare compliance depends on retaining professional decision-making authority.


Administrative Support and Clinical Decision-Making

An MSO may provide payroll, scheduling, equipment, and IT support. Diagnosis, treatment, and clinical supervision remain professional responsibilities.

Staff scheduling differs from selecting treating physicians or altering clinical protocols for profit. Compare actual practices with contracts. Related issues appear under healthcare management solutions.

Management Fees and Fee-Splitting Restrictions

Education Law § 6530(18) addresses payments for referrals or in connection with professional services. Section 6530(19) restricts sharing professional fees, including certain charges for space, equipment, facilities, or personnel based on practice income or receipts. Statutory exceptions, including provisions concerning certain licensed facilities, require separate review.

A fixed fee does not excuse transferred medical control or disguised referral payments. Separately, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b), regulates remuneration intended to induce federal program referrals, subject to applicable exceptions and safe harbors.


3. Provider Contracts Must Match the Practice's Governance


Provider agreements may contradict ownership documents. Compare their terms against the management agreement.


Clinical Staffing and Professional Authority

Identify who selects clinicians, supervises care, and sets protocols. Recruiting assistance does not authorize an outside manager to direct treatment.

If physicians bear treatment responsibility while investors can override their decisions, examine who actually exercises that power.

Compensation, Referrals, and Exit Provisions

Examine physician pay, management fees, equipment leases, and referral incentives. Revenue-based charges require different analysis from documented administrative fees. Federal-program referrals warrant separate review.

Termination terms should address access to records, systems, premises, and equipment. An MSO's departure should not leave essential practice operations under its unilateral control.


4. Facility Classification Determines State Approval Requirements


Diagram: Decision tree illustrating how Article 28 facilities face strict establishment rules compared to private practices.
Diagram: Decision tree illustrating how Article 28 facilities face strict establishment rules compared to private practices.

Private offices and Article 28 facilities face different licensing rules. Actual operations determine classification.


Private Practices and Article 28 Facilities

Under 10 NYCRR § 600.8, factors distinguishing private practice from a regulated facility include patient contact, practitioner selection, records, and billing arrangements. Describing a business as a “clinic” can constitute prima facie evidence of facility operation, but it is not the only consideration.

Section 751.1 excludes individual or group private medical practice from its diagnostic and treatment center definition. Formation documents alone therefore cannot establish whether a facility operating certificate is required.

Establishment, Operating Certificates, and Outside Managers

For covered Article 28 facilities, Public Health Law § 2801-a generally requires establishment approval, and § 2805 requires an operating certificate. Section 2802 governs certain construction approvals. These requirements do not automatically apply to an ordinary physician office. See New York Public Health Law for the broader framework.

Under 10 NYCRR § 600.9, facility operators face separate restrictions on delegating management. When an Article 28 LLC appoints a manager who is not a member, Department of Health guidance requires an approved written agreement preserving specified member authority. Submission is generally due 60 days before the intended effective date, subject to a written exception for extraordinary circumstances.


5. Medical Business Transactions Require Document-Based Review


An investment must work legally in practice. Check control documents before signing or closing.


Records That Show Who Holds Each Power

Review documents establishing ownership and actual authority:

  • Formation documents, ownership registers, licenses, and operating agreements.
  • Voting proxies, investor vetoes, financing terms, and bank authorizations.
  • MSO contracts, leases, and provider compensation schedules.
  • Operating certificates, approvals, and regulatory correspondence.

Compare documents with daily operations; a compliance clause cannot cure improper control.

Closing Conditions and Continuing Compliance

Identify approvals and filings needed before closing or beginning operations. Public Health Law §§ 4550 and 4552 require at least 30 days' advance notice for qualifying material health care transactions. The definition excludes certain transactions, including those increasing gross in-state revenue by less than $25 million and transactions already covered by specified approval regimes.

Transaction notices differ from facility approvals. A health care lawyer can review filing deadlines, contract revisions, and post-closing duties. Healthcare private equity covers broader investment considerations; this review focuses on who may own, manage, and exercise clinical judgment.

29 Apr, 2026


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Online Consultation
Phone Consultation