Go to integrated search
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

How Does a Bad Faith Insurance Claim Work for Policyholders?



A bad faith insurance claim arises when an insurer unreasonably denies, delays, or fails to investigate a valid policyholder claim without a proper factual basis.

Under established common law principles across the United States, insurance policies contain an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Policyholders facing improper claim handling may seek contractual damages as well as statutory remedies or extra-contractual damages depending on the governing jurisdiction and policy terms.


1. Legal Foundation of Bad Faith Insurance Claims


When individuals or businesses purchase insurance policies, they enter into a binding contractual relationship. Every insurance contract incorporates an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing.


Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

This legal principle requires the insurance carrier to treat the policyholder's interests with equal consideration to its own financial interests.

When an insurer breaches this duty, the policyholder may have grounds for a bad faith insurance claim. A simple denial of coverage or a genuine dispute over valuation does not automatically constitute bad faith. Instead, bad faith requires evidence that the insurance company acted unreasonably, maliciously, or without reasonable cause when handling the claim.

First-Party and Third-Party Insurance Claims

CategoryPrimary Characteristics
First-Party ClaimsFiled directly by the policyholder against their own insurance carrier (e.g., property, disability, or commercial coverage).
Third-Party ClaimsInvolves a claim made against a policyholder by a third party, where the insurer owes a duty to defend and indemnify.

First-Party Claims

  • Primary CharacteristicsFiled directly by the policyholder against their own insurance carrier (e.g., property, disability, or commercial coverage).

Third-Party Claims

  • Primary CharacteristicsInvolves a claim made against a policyholder by a third party, where the insurer owes a duty to defend and indemnify.

For policyholders facing complex coverage disputes, consulting legal counsel experienced in commercial litigation helps clarify available remedies under both common law principles and specific state statutes.


2. Recognized Categories of Unreasonable Insurance Conduct


Insurance companies must evaluate claims using established standard operating procedures and impartial investigation methods. Policyholders often encounter bad faith practices through several common patterns of misconduct.


Unreasonable Delay in Investigation or Payment

Insurance carriers are required to acknowledge and investigate claims within reasonable timeframes. Unjustifiable delays in assigning adjusters, requesting repetitive documentation, or withholding benefit payments without cause frequently form the basis for legal action.

Arbitrary Denial of Valid Claims

Denying a claim without performing a thorough investigation or relying on flawed factual interpretations violates basic insurance standards. Insurers cannot intentionally misinterpret policy language to exclude coverage for legitimate losses.

Failure to Defend or Indemnify

In third-party liability coverage, insurers hold a legal duty to defend policyholders against covered lawsuits. Refusing to provide a defense or failing to settle within policy limits when liability is clear can expose the insurer to extra-contractual liabilities.

Understanding these operational failures is crucial when evaluating potential remedies in a breach of contract action against a non-compliant insurance provider.


3. Legal Elements Required to Prove Bad Faith


To establish a bad faith insurance claim successfully, a policyholder generally must demonstrate specific legal elements under applicable state laws:

  • Proof of Coverage: The policyholder must show that a valid, active policy covered the underlying loss or risk.
  • Absence of Reasonable Basis: The insurer lacked a reasonable or arguable basis for denying, delaying, or discounting the claim.
  • Insurer's Knowledge or Reckless Disregard: The insurance carrier knew, or recklessly disregarded, that its position lacked reasonable support under the policy terms.

Courts evaluate these elements using an objective standard to determine whether a reasonable insurer under similar circumstances would have acted in the same manner.



4. Potential Damages and Remedies Available to Policyholders


Diagram: Vertical checklist showing contractual damages, extra-contractual damages, and statutory penalties.
Diagram: Vertical checklist showing contractual damages, extra-contractual damages, and statutory penalties.

When an insurer commits bad faith, legal recovery often extends beyond the original benefits stated in the contract. Policyholders may seek various forms of compensation depending on the jurisdiction.


Contractual Damages

Contractual damages restore the benefits owed under the original policy, such as property repair costs, medical expenses, or business interruption losses.

Extra-Contractual Damages

Extra-contractual damages compensate policyholders for consequential economic losses caused by the insurer's delay or denial. These may include interest on delayed payments, lost business revenue, or additional financing expenses incurred while awaiting claim resolution.

Statutory Penalties and Attorney’S Fees

Many jurisdictions provide statutory remedies for bad faith practices. Courts may award statutory interest, mandatory attorney's fees, or liquidated penalties when an insurer acts in conscious disregard of policyholder rights.

For corporate policyholders navigating major financial disputes, evaluating potential claims alongside broader business litigation strategies helps ensure comprehensive protection of corporate assets.


5. Educational Hypothetical Example


Hypothetical Example for Educational Purposes Only

A policyholder sustains severe storm damage to a commercial warehouse and promptly files a claim under a commercial property policy. The insurance carrier receives full documentation, structural engineering reports, and repair estimates. Despite receiving clear proof of covered damage, the insurer delays assigning a claims adjuster for six months, fails to conduct a site inspection, and eventually denies the claim using an outdated exclusion clause.

In this scenario, the insurer's failure to conduct a prompt investigation, combined with an arbitrary denial without factual support, illustrates conduct that commonly forms the factual basis for a bad faith insurance claim.



6. Steps to Protect Policyholder Rights during a Claim Dispute


When experiencing unreasonable pushback or delays from an insurance company, policyholders can take proactive measures to build a strong evidentiary record:

  1. Maintain Written Documentation: Keep detailed written records of all communications, including emails, letters, phone call logs, and adjuster names.
  2. Review Policy Terms Carefully: Examine the policy declaration pages, endorsements, and exclusion clauses to verify coverage scope and compliance duties.
  3. Submit Complete Records: Provide clear proof of loss, professional estimates, and supporting medical or property records promptly to fulfill contractual duties.
  4. Demand Written Explanations: Request that the insurer provide formal written explanations specifying the legal and factual grounds for any coverage denial or delay.
  5. Seek Legal Evaluation: Consult legal professionals specializing in insurance coverage and business disputes to evaluate the strength of a bad faith action before statutory deadlines expire.

15 Sep, 2026


The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Reading or relying on the contents of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship with our firm. For advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Certain informational content on this website may utilize technology-assisted drafting tools and is subject to attorney review.

Related practices


Online Consultation
Phone Consultation