Go to integrated search
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

What If Franchise Earnings Claims Differ from Fdd Item 19?

Área de práctica:Corporate

Compare pre-sale earnings claims with FDD Item 19, check the supporting data, and preserve records before assessing your legal options.

If you already own a franchise, start with the FDD you received before signing and the emails, presentations, or notes documenting what you were told. Check whether the figures use the same measures, periods, and comparable outlets. A difference alone does not establish a violation; the basis and context of the claim matter.

Contents


1. Pinpoint the Difference between the Sales Pitch and Item 19


Identify the statement that influenced your purchase: who made it, when, and whether it concerned sales, profit, or projected income. Compare it with the Franchise Disclosure Document you received before committing.



The Federal Standard


The FTC Franchise Rule prohibits covered sellers from contradicting required disclosures. Financial performance representations generally require inclusion in Item 19, a reasonable basis, and written substantiation when made, subject to specific exceptions.



Discrepancies Worth Examining


Different figures may reflect different periods or accounting measures. Closer review is warranted when a seller presents gross sales as take-home income or uses established outlets to suggest what a new operator will earn. Poor results alone do not establish that the original claim lacked support.



2. Compare the Figures and Their Assumptions


Use the FDD version you received before signing. A later version may contain different figures or qualifications.



Build a Comparison Record


Comparison PointWhat to CheckRecords to Preserve
Earnings measureSales, profit, or owner compensationEmails and calculation sheets
Reporting periodHistorical results or forecastsDated FDD and presentations
Included outletsNew, established, franchised, or company-ownedSample descriptions and exclusions
Operating conditionsSize, experience, staffing, owner involvementAssumptions and sales communications
Achieved resultsAverage figures and outlets reaching themSupporting calculations


Check the Basis Behind the Numbers


Historical representations require disclosures about the outlet population, reporting period, data used, and outlets achieving the stated results. Material differences between included outlets and the offered outlet also matter. Forecasts require material bases and assumptions. A mathematically accurate average may still raise questions about how the seller presented its relevance.



3. When Different Information May Be Permitted


Diagram: Actual records concern the specific outlet being purchased; supplements must explain departures and meet basis and disclosure requirements.
Diagram: Actual records concern the specific outlet being purchased; supplements must explain departures and meet basis and disclosure requirements.

Information outside Item 19 is not automatically prohibited. The federal rule recognizes specific circumstances allowing different financial information.



Actual Records for an Existing Outlet


A franchisor may provide actual operating results for a specific existing outlet to potential purchasers of that outlet. This exception does not authorize using those results indiscriminately to market new locations.



Written Supplemental Representations


A franchisor providing an Item 19 representation may furnish a supplement for a particular location or variation. It must be written, explain the departure, and satisfy specified requirements concerning its basis and disclosures. A verbal assurance does not qualify simply because the seller calls it location-specific.



4. Find Out What Supported the Claim


Ask the franchisor to identify the source data, calculations, assumptions, and outlet characteristics behind the disputed statement.



Check When the Records Existed


The federal rule requires a reasonable basis and written substantiation when the representation is made. Check whether a later explanation identifies records that existed then and whether those records address the claim you received.



Access to Supporting Records after Signing


The rule’s substantiation provisions expressly address prospective franchisees and the FTC. Existing ownership does not automatically provide unrestricted access to internal records. After signing, access may depend on the contract, applicable law, voluntary disclosure, or discovery.



5. Preserve the Sales Record


Keep original files and complete message threads with attachments and available metadata. Screenshots may omit dates, recipients, or qualifications.



Materials to Keep


  • The delivered FDD, amendments, supplements, and receipt.
  • Emails, texts, advertisements, slides, and worksheets.
  • Existing recordings and contemporaneous notes identifying speakers.
  • Signed questionnaires, acknowledgments, and agreements.
  • Investment budgets, financing records, and operating statements.


Timeline and Contract Terms


Connect the claim, FDD delivery, signing, payment, and discovery of the discrepancy in a dated timeline. Label later recollections clearly. Keep your franchise agreements alongside it; notice, arbitration, forum, and acknowledgment provisions may affect the next steps.



6. What the Ftc’S October Materials Illustrate


The FTC’s October 2026 materials show why comparison outlets’ characteristics matter when evaluating earnings explanations.



Complaint and Follow-Up Guidance


The October 5 complaint against Premier Franchising Group and Franchise Fastlane alleged material differences between established operators and new franchisees undermined earnings representations. Those allegations were not findings of liability. The October 19 consumer alert provided follow-up guidance; it did not announce a new complaint or amend Item 19 requirements.



7. Separate Federal Standards from Individual Remedies


The FTC Franchise Rule does not itself create a private right of action. Individual claims may depend on applicable state statutes, misrepresentation law, or contractual rights.



Facts Needed for a Claim Review


Organize what you received, how it affected your investment decision, and what losses followed. Reliance requirements, remedies, and deadlines vary by claim and jurisdiction. An apparent disclosure problem does not automatically authorize stopping royalties or terminating the agreement.



8. Frequently Asked Questions


What if Item 19 says no earnings representations are made?

Preserve that statement alongside the disputed claim. Identify who made the statement, whether it is attributable to a covered franchise seller, and whether an exception applies.

What if I denied receiving earnings claims in a signed statement?

Keep that statement with the relevant communications. It may create an evidentiary issue, but its wording and legal effect require individual review. It does not necessarily defeat a claim.



9. Preparing for Legal Review


Bring your comparison table, timeline, and records to a franchise dispute review. Counsel can assess potential claims, deadlines, and contract requirements before you send a demand, sign a release, or change your contractual performance.


28 Oct, 2026


La información proporcionada en este artículo es únicamente con fines informativos generales y no constituye asesoramiento legal. Los resultados anteriores no garantizan un resultado similar. La lectura o el uso del contenido de este artículo no crea una relación abogado-cliente con nuestro despacho. Para asesoramiento sobre su situación específica, consulte a un abogado calificado autorizado en su jurisdicción.
Ciertos contenidos informativos en este sitio web pueden utilizar herramientas de redacción asistidas por tecnología y están sujetos a revisión por parte de un abogado.

Reservar una consulta
Online
Phone