Go to integrated search
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

Insurance Fraud Investigation in New York and Criminal Exposure

取扱分野:Criminal Law

Insurance fraud investigation in New York can move from an insurer’s SIU review to regulatory or criminal scrutiny.

A questioned claim does not by itself establish insurance fraud. Investigators may compare claim documents, statements, billing records, and other evidence to determine whether false information was knowingly submitted with intent to defraud. Risk increases when suspected fraud is reported to New York regulators or the matter develops into a criminal investigation.

Contents


1. How Does an Insurance Fraud Investigation Begin in New York?


How Does an Insurance Fraud Investigation Begin in New York?

An investigation often starts inside the insurance company before police, prosecutors, or regulators make contact. Certain New York insurers must maintain fraud prevention programs and special investigations units, commonly called SIUs.



An Siu Review Is Not a Criminal Charge


An SIU examines suspected fraudulent activity for the insurer. Investigators may compare an application, claim, billing record, recorded statement, supporting document, or other evidence for inconsistencies.

An SIU referral does not establish guilt. It means the transaction is receiving additional scrutiny. When the concern involves possible intentional misrepresentation, the matter may create broader insurance fraud exposure.



Suspected Fraud May Be Reported to Dfs


New York Insurance Law § 405 requires licensed or registered insurance persons and other covered insurance businesses to report a transaction that appears fraudulent within 30 days after making that determination.

The Department of Financial Services may review the report and conduct further investigation. A claim dispute can therefore move beyond the insurer even though it did not begin as a criminal case.



2. What Must Be Proven for Insurance Fraud Charges?


New York Penal Law Article 176 defines the conduct that can support an insurance fraud charge. A mistake, inconsistency, or disputed claim amount does not automatically satisfy those criminal elements.



Knowledge, Materiality, and Intent Matter


Under Penal Law § 176.05, a fraudulent insurance act can include knowingly presenting or preparing specified insurance documents that contain materially false information, or conceal material information for the purpose of misleading, while acting with intent to defraud.

For a person under investigation, key questions may include:

  • Was the information actually false or concealed?
  • Was it material to the insurance transaction?
  • Did the person know the information was false?
  • Was there an intent to defraud?
  • Did another person prepare or alter the disputed material?
  • Do surrounding records support a nonfraudulent explanation?

These issues may overlap with broader white collar defense when investigators begin reviewing communications, financial records, or business activity.



The Alleged Value Can Change the Charge


Higher degrees of insurance fraud depend in part on the value allegedly wrongfully taken, obtained, withheld, or attempted.

ChargeValue RequirementClassification
Fifth degreeNo dollar thresholdClass A misdemeanor
Fourth degreeMore than $1,000Class E felony
Third degreeMore than $3,000Class D felony
Second degreeMore than $50,000Class C felony
First degreeMore than $1 millionClass B felony

The value calculation can therefore affect the seriousness of the charge, but the prosecution still must establish a fraudulent insurance act.



3. What Evidence Matters during the Investigation?


The relevant evidence depends on the policy, claim, and alleged misrepresentation. Investigators commonly compare records created at different stages to determine whether an inconsistency was knowing and material.



Claim Records Should Be Compared before Explaining Differences


Relevant materials can include proofs of loss, applications, invoices, medical bills, payroll records, repair estimates, financial documents, and prior statements.

A discrepancy does not necessarily prove fraud. Different dates, accounting methods, third-party errors, incomplete information, or misunderstandings can produce records that appear inconsistent.

When the allegation centers on financial documentation, the review may overlap with an accounting fraud investigation.



Additional Statements Can Become Evidence


An insurer may request records, an interview, an affidavit, or another explanation. In some claims, an examination under oath may also be requested.

A new statement can be compared with earlier records and testimony. Before responding, the person under investigation should understand which facts are disputed and whether the matter remains an insurance review or has expanded into regulatory or criminal scrutiny.



4. When Can an Siu Investigation Become a Criminal Matter?


Diagram: Flow from insurer review to SIU investigation, then DFS review, with possible progression to a criminal investigation.
Diagram: Flow from insurer review to SIU investigation, then DFS review, with possible progression to a criminal investigation.

There is no automatic point at which an SIU file becomes a criminal prosecution. The path depends on the insurer’s findings, statutory reporting, DFS review, and whether law enforcement or prosecutors pursue the matter.



Dfs Can Investigate and Report Suspected Criminal Activity


DFS has statutory authority to investigate suspected violations of New York insurance law. When the Superintendent is satisfied that fraud or other criminal activity under the insurance law has been committed or attempted, Financial Services Law § 409 provides for reporting to appropriate authorities, including a district attorney or the Attorney General.

A matter may therefore move through:

Insurer review → SIU investigation → DFS review → possible criminal investigation

Not every case reaches each stage.



A Business Investigation Can Expand Beyond One Claim


When a claim involves a business, investigators may look beyond the original submission and examine invoices, payroll, billing practices, employee conduct, or related transactions.

That broader review can affect both the organization and individuals involved in preparing or submitting information. Allegations involving repeated business practices may also raise separate corporate fraud issues.



5. Frequently Asked Questions


Do I Have to Attend an Examination Under Oath During an Insurance Fraud Investigation?

The answer depends on the policy and the claim. In New York no-fault matters, an insurer may require an examination under oath to establish proof of claim when the request is supported by specific objective justification and complies with applicable claim procedures.

An EUO creates sworn testimony that can later be compared with documents and earlier statements. An attorney can review the request, policy terms, disputed facts, and investigation status before the examination.

Can I Be Charged if the Insurance Company Never Paid the Claim?

Yes, potentially. New York insurance fraud does not always require a completed payment. Higher-degree offenses expressly cover attempts to wrongfully take, obtain, or withhold property above the applicable value threshold, while fifth-degree insurance fraud is based on committing a fraudulent insurance act.

The absence of payment does not eliminate the need to prove the underlying fraudulent act, knowledge, and intent to defraud.



6. When an Insurance Fraud Investigation Needs Legal Review


Legal review becomes more important when the insurer requests sworn testimony, demands extensive records, identifies suspected fraud, DFS makes contact, or law enforcement begins asking questions.

An attorney can compare the disputed claim with prior statements and records, identify the stage of the investigation, and assess whether the evidence actually supports the required elements under New York law. The immediate issue is often not whether an insurer questions the claim, but whether the facts support knowledge, materiality, intent, and any alleged value necessary for a criminal charge.


01 Oct, 2026


この記事で提供される情報は一般的な情報提供のみを目的としており、法的助言を構成するものではありません。 過去の結果は同様の結果を保証するものではありません。 この記事の内容を読んだり依拠したりしても、当事務所との間で弁護士-クライアント関係は発生しません。 ご自身の具体的な状況に関するアドバイスについては、ご自身の管轄区域で資格を持つ弁護士にご相談ください。
当ウェブサイト上の特定の情報コンテンツは、技術支援起草ツールを使用している場合があり、弁護士の審査対象となります。

相談を予約する
Online
Phone