
3 Priority Considerations in Corporate Merger Matters: Regulatory approval timelines, material adverse change clauses, and post-closing indemnification exposure.Corporate merger involves the combination of two or more entities into a single legal organization, triggering complex contractual, regulatory, and tax implications. For business owners and in-house counsel evaluating a transaction, the legal framework governing mergers demands early attention to structural risk, negotiating leverage, and the practical mechanics of integration. This article addresses the key legal considerations that shape merger outcomes and the strategic decisions counsel should prioritize before signing definitive agreements.
Lire la suite

3 Bottom-Line Points on Supply Agreements from Counsel: Pricing, payment terms drive disputes, force majeure clauses require clear definitionSupply agreements form the backbone of most commercial relationships, yet many businesses enter these arrangements with incomplete or conflicting understandings about core obligations. As counsel, I see clients discover critical gaps only when a supplier fails to deliver, a buyer refuses payment, or market conditions shift and neither party has contractual protection. A well-drafted supply agreement allocates risk, sets enforceable deadlines, and preserves remedies when performance falters. This article examines the legal architecture that protects both suppliers and buyers, highlights the disputes that most frequently arise, and identifies the strategic decisions you should make before signing.Supply Agreement ElementTypical ExposureStrategic ActionPricing and Volume CommitmentsPrice escalation disputes; minimum purchase obligations unmetLock price term; define volume ranges with flexibility clausesDelivery and Performance DeadlinesLate shipments; no contractual remedy for delaySpecify delivery dates, inspection windows, and remedies for breachForce Majeure and Excusable DelayDisputes over what events excuse non-performanceDefine force majeure events explicitly; require notice and mitigationTermination and Exit RightsLocked into unprofitable relationship; no clean exitNegotiate termination for convenience or cause; specify notice periodsLiability and IndemnificationUnlimited damages exposure; no cap on claimsCap liability; define indemnifiable losses; exclude consequential damages
Lire la suite

NYC franchise law sets strict FDD delivery timelines and termination notice rules. Learn how to spot violations and protect your franchise investment from liability. Franchise law requires franchisors to deliver the FDD at least 14 days before signing, and violations can result in rescission, damages, or statutory penalties under New York law. Termination disputes under New York franchise law hinge on whether proper notice and cure periods were honored before the agreement was ended, making early documentation of any franchise law violation your strongest asset.
Lire la suite

3 Questions Decision-Makers Raise About Corporate Ethics and Compliance: Board-level governance exposure, regulatory audit triggers, employee misconduct liability.In-house counsel and business decision-makers often confront ethics and compliance questions that carry significant legal and reputational weight. As a NYC corporate lawyer advising companies across industries, I see that many organizations treat compliance as a checklist rather than a strategic framework. The distinction matters enormously. Compliance failures can result in federal penalties, shareholder litigation, and operational disruption. This article addresses the core questions that arise when building or auditing an ethics and compliance program, and where legal guidance becomes essential.
Lire la suite

3 Bottom-Line Points on ESG Compliance Review from Counsel: Board disclosure obligations under state law, material risk identification, documentationIn-house counsel and corporate decision-makers face mounting pressure to demonstrate robust environmental, social, and governance frameworks. A corporate attorney in New York City working on ESG compliance review must help clients understand that this is no longer a voluntary sustainability exercise. Courts, regulators, and shareholders now treat ESG commitments as enforceable representations that expose the company to claims if performance falls short of public statements. The stakes are highest for companies with significant New York operations or shareholder bases.
Lire la suite

Transferring contracts in a deal creates real liability exposure. This guide covers successor liability, consent pitfalls, and negotiation strategy under New York law. Assignment and assumption agreements run through most New York business transfers, but many deals run into trouble not at signing, but in the weeks after closing. Successor liability, non-assignable contracts, and creditor claims tend to emerge after the ink is dry. This guide walks through the mechanics, the corporate scenarios where these agreements matter most, and the failure points our attorneys encounter most often.
Lire la suite
