Communication Media Obscenity Lawyer | I was amazed by the attorney's attentiveness.

The client who came to the Communication Media Obscenity Lawyer

The client who came to the Communication Media Obscenity Lawyer had been sued after a comment left on an online shorts video was mistaken for an insulting and sexually harassing remark.

It was merely an expression of impressions related to exercise, but the other party misunderstood it as having a sexual meaning, and the client ended up being caught in criminal proceedings.

In particular, since this was a case in which the victim sued multiple commenters at the same time, the client came to the Communication Media Obscenity Lawyer with an anxious mind, saying, "I feel like I have been unfairly branded a criminal," and requested assistance.

Communication Media Obscenity Lawyer proves there was no sexual purpose, resulting in a 'decision not to refer'

The Communication Media Obscenity Lawyer established a defense strategy focused on the point that there was no 'purpose of arousing or satisfying sexual desire' at all, which is an element of the offense of obscenity using communication media.

By comprehensively analyzing the context of the comment, the general meaning of the expressions used, and the nature of the post at the time, the attorney emphasized that it was simply a reaction related to exercise, and specifically demonstrated that there was no obscene purpose in terms of intent or context.

As a result, the investigative agency determined that it was difficult to regard the client's comment as the offense of obscenity using communication media, and made a decision not to refer the case.

If you have been caught up in a criminal case due to an unexpected online comment, rather than responding alone, we hope you will receive the assistance of a Communication Media Obscenity Lawyer to prepare an accurate legal assessment and strategic response.

🔗Explore the types and punishment levels of the offense of obscenity using communication media