Case Analysis / Legal Updates
Violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act | Pharmacy Manager Who Hired a Pharmacist with a Forged License Found Not Guilty
The court acquitted a pharmacy manager who, on charges of violating the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, had employed a fraudster posing as a pharmacist by forging a pharmacist's license.
1. Violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, the Detailed Circumstances
A, who was brought to trial on charges of violating the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, was a pharmacy manager operating a pharmacy in Jeju, and was charged with having employed B, who had forged a pharmacist's license.
B needed money because loan debts had accumulated following failed investments, and, drawing on prior experience working at a pharmacy, decided to pose as a pharmacist.
B then found A's pharmacy, which was recruiting a pharmacist on a job-search website, and attended an interview.
At an internet cafe, B searched for and printed a pharmacist's license form bearing the official seal of the Minister of Health and Welfare, attached a personal photograph, added a license number, a name, and a date of birth, and then created a forged pharmacist's license using a multifunction printer.
During the pharmacy interview with A, B submitted this forged pharmacist's license and also falsely claimed to have graduated from a particular pharmacy school and to have three years of experience working at a pharmacy.
Deceived by this, A employed B, and over approximately three years B sold pharmaceuticals worth approximately 1.476 billion won at A's pharmacy.
As a result of this case, B was sentenced to two years' imprisonment on charges of forgery of an official document, uttering a forged official document, fraud, and violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, and A was also sentenced to a fine of 5 million won with a one-year suspended sentence (a suspended sentence under Korean law, broadly comparable to a suspended sentence or probation in common-law systems, under which the conviction loses its effect once the suspension period passes without incident) on charges of violating the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act.
In response, A appealed, arguing that A “had no knowledge whatsoever that the pharmacist's license presented by B was forged, and was, on the contrary, merely a victim deceived by B.”
Violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, the Relevant Statutes
As in the above case, a pharmacy manager who employs a person that has forged a pharmacist's license also bears legal responsibility. The reason is that the pharmacy received only a copy of the forged license and did not properly carry out a procedure to verify the pharmacist's license.
The relevant applicable statutes are set out below.
▣ Pharmaceutical Affairs Act Article 6 (Issuance and Registration of Licenses)
(1) When granting a pharmacist's license or an herbal pharmacist's license, the Minister of Health and Welfare shall register the matters concerning the license in the respective registration book and issue the license.
(2) If the license under paragraph (1) is lost or damaged, or if the entries therein change, the license may be reissued.
(3) A pharmacist and an herbal pharmacist shall not lend a license obtained under Article 3 and Article 4 to another person.
(4) No one shall borrow a license obtained under Article 3 and Article 4, nor shall anyone broker the lending of a license.
▣ Enforcement Rule of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, Article 11 (Posting of Registration Certificates and Permits)
(2) A pharmacy establisher, or a pharmacist or herbal pharmacist working at a pharmacy, shall post the original of the relevant pharmacist's license or herbal pharmacist's license in a conspicuous place within that pharmacy.
2. Violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, the Appellate Court's Determination
A, who had been sentenced at the first instance to a suspended fine on charges of violating the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, was found not guilty on appeal.
The appellate court held that, “insofar as A misperceived B to be a pharmacist and employed B on that basis, A cannot be regarded as having a duty to manage and supervise B at the same level as an ordinary employee,” and found that “the first-instance judgment, which applied the charge of violating the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act on the ground of a breach of the duty to manage and supervise, was not lawful.”
In addition, the fact that B, at A's pharmacy, did not compound pharmaceuticals but handled only the sale of over-the-counter pharmaceuticals and worked independently also served as a basis for the not-guilty judgment.
The court held that “A is a victim who was defrauded by B,” and pronounced that it “reverses the first-instance guilty judgment and finds the defendant not guilty.”
3. Violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, Daeryun's Strategy
We analyzed the district court's judgment, which at the first instance imposed a suspended fine on the ground that the defendant, on charges of violating the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, had employed a person holding a forged license, but on appeal returned a verdict of not guilty.
After this case, awareness of the need to verify pharmacist licenses grew among pharmacy managers. The authenticity of matters relating to a pharmacist's license can be checked through the Ministry of Health and Welfare license services website.
If it is revealed that an unqualified person was employed to compound or sell pharmaceuticals, the pharmacy will be subject to a business suspension disposition under Article 76 of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, and the pharmacy establisher will also be subject to disposition.
If you have been wrongly charged with violating the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act, you may wish to retain a 🔗medical attorney to proceed with the case.
Daeryun Law Firm LLP, with substantial medical knowledge and experience, and its 🔗Medical Litigation Group, will actively assist clients.
Related Information
Explore legal information related to this case.
Violation of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act: Criminal Punishment and Administrative Disposition Under the Enforcement Rule of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act
Physician's License: Standards for a Revocation Decision, the Reissuance Period, and the Procedure for Challenge
Standards for Revocation of a Physician's License, the Procedure for Challenging It, and Requirements for Reissuance
Daeryun's Key Strengths

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology
More than 240 key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)
more strengths
Book a legal
consultation with an attorney
All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.
Phone consultation
1800-7905
Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year


Online consultation
We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys
Related Members
View moreRelated Practice Areas
View moreConsult in other languages
Popular Columns
View moreGuide to the Procedure for Reporting Violations of the Medical Service Act and Methods for Securing Evidence

What Is Medical Negligence? Criteria for Determination and Levels of Punishment

How to Have a Physician's License Reissued or Reacquired After License Revocation

What Are the Punishment Standards and the Method of Reporting Unlicensed Medical Practice?

A Guide to the Procedure for Medical Accident Damages Litigation and How to Prepare Evidence

Previous
Insurance Benefit Dispute | Reimbursement Disposition Imposed for Insurance Benefits Paid After an Accident Caused by a Traffic Signal Violation Was Revoked on the Ground That Gross Negligence Was Difficult to Find
Next
Interference With Business | Judgment Awarding 10 Million Won in Damages Against a Former Instructor Who Posted False Statements
View listDo you have more questions?











