شيم جا هيون Senior Attorney | شركة داريون للمحاماة - الخبراء والمحامون الموصى بهم

شيم جا هيون

Senior Attorney

العنف المدرسي / المحامي الجنائي

T. 070-7510-1755

شيم جا هيون

Senior Attorney

العنف المدرسي / المحامي الجنائي

T. 070-7510-1755

"سنساعد عملائنا على تحقيق النتائج التي يريدونها من خلال مراجعة احترافية وشاملة للحالة."

لدينا خبرة واسعة في مختلف الدعاوى القضائية التي تتطلب مراجعة احترافية، مثل القيادة تحت تأثير الكحول، وحوادث المرور، والجرائم الجنسية، والتعويض عن الأضرار، والتصيد الصوتي. وعلى وجه الخصوص، لقد تراكمت لدي الكثير من الخبرة العملية والخبرة من خلال مشاركتي في العديد من حالات العنف المدرسي وجرائم الأحداث. نحن نبذل قصارى جهدنا لحماية حقوق الإنسان للعملاء القاصرين من خلال الحصول على أحكام خفيفة نسبيًا مثل أمر حماية الأحداث رقم 1 و2 حتى في حالات الجرائم الجنسية أو الإصابات الخاصة التي يتعرض لها طلاب المدارس المتوسطة والثانوية.

مجالات الممارسة ذات الصلة

الخبرة

(Former) Public Defender, Gwangju District Court
(Former) Non-stop public defender for arrest cases at Gwangju District Court
(Former) Beopseung Law Firm
(Current) Daeryun Law Firm (Limited)

الأنشطة الرئيسية

Member of the Human Rights and Legal Aid Committee of the Gwangju Local Bar Association
Gwangju Local Bar Association Migrant Legal Support Lawyers Member
Interviews and newspaper contributions related to school violence, stalking crimes, etc.

الإنجازات الرئيسية

In the case of a voice phishing collector found guilty in the first trial, the defendant was acquitted in the second trial by denying the defendant's intention and overturning the first trial.
In a case of forced molestation, the case was acquitted due to denial of intent even though contact with the victim's buttocks was acknowledged.
In a case of violation of the Stalking Punishment Act, a case in which acquittal was claimed by making a legal interpretation despite the fact that there were no lower court precedents or papers, etc.
Even though it was impossible to judge the possibility of avoidance in the case of a fatal accident by a teacher, the basis for the claim of innocence in the defense opinion was recorded in the judgment as is, and the case was acquitted.
In a loan fraud case, the case was acquitted even though it was acknowledged that the loan was returned.
In a case of violation of the Information and Communications Network Act (defamation), the facts stated in the indictment were acknowledged, but the case was acquitted through legal arguments.
In a case where he was indicted for violating the Stalking Punishment Act due to several acts of stalking, he was partially acquitted (partially acquitted, ultimately fined) by claiming that some of the acts did not constitute stalking.
A case in which a middle school student was charged with using a camera to secretly film a victim defecating in the women's restroom, and was acquitted (not guilty stated in the decision) after contesting the charges in a juvenile trial.
Case of forcible molestation of a minor under the age of 13 and violation of the Child Welfare Act, in which the charges were contested in a juvenile trial and the case was acquitted.
A case of attempted special theft in which a 6th grade elementary school student conspired with another student to steal a motorcycle using a knife. A case in which only the client student was exempted.