تشو يونج سام Chief Managing Attorney | شركة داريون للمحاماة

تشو يونج سام

Chief Managing Attorney

قاضي محكمة مقاطعة تشنتشون تجربة قاضي محكمة مقاطعة تشانغوون فرع ميريانغ

T. 070-7510-2014

تشو يونج سام

Chief Managing Attorney

قاضي محكمة مقاطعة تشنتشون تجربة قاضي محكمة مقاطعة تشانغوون فرع ميريانغ

T. 070-7510-2014

"دعونا نتمتع دائمًا بقلب مراعٍ ونراعي الآخرين."

اكتسب المحامي يونغسام تشو، وهو عضو في مجموعة التحكيم في الدعاوى المدنية ومجموعة الاستجابة للعنف المدرسي، خبرة واسعة في المحاكمات في القضايا المدنية أثناء عمله كقاضي في محكمة منطقة تشنتشون، وفرع ميريانغ من محكمة منطقة تشانغوون، ومحكمة منطقة تشانغوون. واستنادًا إلى هذا الفهم العميق لممارسة المحكمة، فقد قمنا بحل العديد من القضايا المعقدة. بالإضافة إلى ذلك، عمل كوسيط مدني لفرع جانجنيونج لمحكمة منطقة تشانشيون، ومحاميًا استشاريًا لشركة إدارة الأصول الكورية، ومحاميًا استشاريًا لقاعة مدينة جانجنيونج، ولديه رؤية عميقة في الدعاوى الإدارية والمدنية وحل النزاعات المختلفة. وهو محامٍ يحاول دائمًا حل المشكلات من وجهة نظر العميل استنادًا إلى روح "التفكير بشكل مختلف" و"الرحمة".

مجالات الممارسة ذات الصلة

الخبرة

(Former) Judge of Chuncheon District Court [Warrant only, Civil affairs only, Auction only]
(Former) Judge, Miryang Branch, Changwon District Court [Exclusive civil, exclusive criminal]
(Former) Changwon District Court Judge [Criminal Appeal, Civil Appeal]
(Former) Advisor, Korea Asset Management Corporation
(Former) Civil Mediation Committee Member, Gangneung Branch, Chuncheon District Court
(Former) Litigation relief lawyer at Korea Family Legal Counseling Center
(Former) Advisor at Gangneung City Hall
(Current) Daeryun Law Firm (Limited)

الأنشطة الرئيسية

Special lecture on court auctions at Kwandong University Lifelong Education Center
Gangneung MBC Radio (Legal Knowledge Commentary)
Member of the Gangwon-do Police Agency Disciplinary Committee
Member of various committees at Gangneung City Hall

الإنجازات الرئيسية

In a bicycle overturning case caused by a defect in a road managed by Gangneung City, a case was won for damages based on the legal principles of defects in public works.
In a lawsuit claiming damages due to assault, the unfairness of the first trial physical examination results was pointed out and the rate of loss of work ability was denied through re-evaluation.
A case that led to a ruling that direct distribution claims cannot be made if there is no resolution on the distribution of compensation to the fishing community.
In a case where a claim for inheritance between brothers was made, the claim was dismissed because property that the claimant had already received as a gift was discovered in the evidence submitted by the other party.
A case that resulted in a Supreme Court decision to quash and remand due to lack of proof of authenticity of the original document.
The case that led to the Supreme Court's first precedent that land use fees can be claimed even when the grave site right is recognized due to the existence of a grave for a long period of time.
A case in which a decision to disapprove mountain development activities was canceled due to complaints from nearby residents, as it was recognized as an abuse of discretion.
A case that led to the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim in a lawsuit seeking confirmation of the right of passage of surrounding land for an unused road
A lawsuit requesting cancellation of the Ministry of Justice's ban on leaving the country for non-payment of taxes to the National Tax Service
A lawsuit requesting confirmation of the right of passage of surrounding land due to obstruction of passage on a neighbor's own land
The case that led to the ruling that the village head appointed by the administrative agency was not a representative of the village council.
A case that led to a not guilty verdict in a case of embezzlement of state-funded research funds by a professor at a provincial university.
In a case where a landscaping contractor was indicted for theft for receiving excessive compensation, he was acquitted after finding that he had no intention of making illegal gains.
A case that led to a not guilty verdict in a case of forced molestation with circumstantial evidence that proved that guilt cannot be found based on the victim's statement alone.
Case in which a female waitress drank alcohol at a cafe licensed as a general restaurant and was found not guilty of violating the Food Sanitation Act due to lack of evidence.