Шим Га Хён Senior Attorney | Дэрюн Lаw LLC – Рекомендуемые эксперты и адвокаты

Шим Га Хён

Senior Attorney

Школьное насилие/юрист по уголовным делам

T. 070-7510-1755

Шим Га Хён

Senior Attorney

Школьное насилие/юрист по уголовным делам

T. 070-7510-1755

«Мы поможем нашим клиентам достичь желаемых результатов посредством профессионального и тщательного рассмотрения дела».

У нас есть обширные ноу-хау в различных судебных процессах, требующих профессионального рассмотрения, таких как вождение в нетрезвом виде, дорожно-транспортные происшествия, сексуальные преступления, компенсация ущерба и голосовой фишинг. В частности, я накопил большой практический опыт и знания, участвуя во многих случаях школьного насилия и подростковой преступности. Мы делаем все возможное, чтобы защитить права несовершеннолетних клиентов, получая относительно легкие постановления, такие как Постановление о защите несовершеннолетних №№ 1 и 2, даже в случаях сексуальных преступлений или особых травм с участием учащихся средних и старших классов.

Связанные области практики

Опыт

(Former) Public Defender, Gwangju District Court
(Former) Non-stop public defender for arrest cases at Gwangju District Court
(Former) Beopseung Law Firm
(Current) Daeryun Law Firm (Limited)

Ключевые направления деятельности

Member of the Human Rights and Legal Aid Committee of the Gwangju Local Bar Association
Gwangju Local Bar Association Migrant Legal Support Lawyers Member
Interviews and newspaper contributions related to school violence, stalking crimes, etc.

Ключевые достижения

In the case of a voice phishing collector found guilty in the first trial, the defendant was acquitted in the second trial by denying the defendant's intention and overturning the first trial.
In a case of forced molestation, the case was acquitted due to denial of intent even though contact with the victim's buttocks was acknowledged.
In a case of violation of the Stalking Punishment Act, a case in which acquittal was claimed by making a legal interpretation despite the fact that there were no lower court precedents or papers, etc.
Even though it was impossible to judge the possibility of avoidance in the case of a fatal accident by a teacher, the basis for the claim of innocence in the defense opinion was recorded in the judgment as is, and the case was acquitted.
In a loan fraud case, the case was acquitted even though it was acknowledged that the loan was returned.
In a case of violation of the Information and Communications Network Act (defamation), the facts stated in the indictment were acknowledged, but the case was acquitted through legal arguments.
In a case where he was indicted for violating the Stalking Punishment Act due to several acts of stalking, he was partially acquitted (partially acquitted, ultimately fined) by claiming that some of the acts did not constitute stalking.
A case in which a middle school student was charged with using a camera to secretly film a victim defecating in the women's restroom, and was acquitted (not guilty stated in the decision) after contesting the charges in a juvenile trial.
Case of forcible molestation of a minor under the age of 13 and violation of the Child Welfare Act, in which the charges were contested in a juvenile trial and the case was acquitted.
A case of attempted special theft in which a 6th grade elementary school student conspired with another student to steal a motorcycle using a knife. A case in which only the client student was exempted.