Юридическая информация
How Do Third-Party Beneficiary Contracts Create Rights in New York?
How third-party beneficiary contracts create New York rights through intent, standing, reliance, and clear contract language. Third-party beneficiary contracts create rights only when the parties intended to benefit a non-signatory, not merely create an incidental benefit. In New York, third-party beneficiary contracts turn on wording, beneficiaries, and reliance or assent. Third-party beneficiary contracts fail when the agreement shows convenience rather than a deliberate right to sue.
Читать далее
Protecting Your Rights in a Consignment Sales Agreement
3 Questions Decision-Makers Raise About Consignment Sales Agreements: Ownership transfer timing, payment terms, and liability exposure, consignee default remedies.A consignment sales agreement governs the relationship between a consignor (the owner of goods) and a consignee (the party selling those goods on the owner's behalf). Unlike a traditional sale, the consignee does not take title to the goods; the consignor retains ownership until the goods are sold to an end customer. For business owners, retailers, and suppliers, this arrangement creates both operational flexibility and legal complexity. The agreement must clearly allocate risk, define payment obligations, and establish remedies when disputes arise. In-house counsel and decision-makers often overlook critical gaps in these agreements, leading to disputes over inventory accountability, payment timing, and consignee insolvency. Understanding the legal framework now can prevent costly litigation later.
Читать далее
Asset Purchase Agreement: Preventing Post-Closing Disputes in New York
An asset purchase agreement transfers business assets, and most post-closing disputes in New York stem from breached representations and price adjustments. Buyers often discover these problems months after closing, when survival periods and escrow deadlines already limit recovery. This article maps the triggers behind these disputes and the drafting choices, from working capital terms to indemnification limits, that determine whether recovery remains possible before signing.
Читать далее
Which Franchise M&A Elements Require Strict Regulatory Compliance?
3 Questions Decision-Makers Raise About Franchise M&A: Due diligence scope and franchise agreement transfer, regulatory compliance and franchisor consent, post-closing liability and successor obligations.Franchise mergers and acquisitions involve distinct legal complexities that differ sharply from standard corporate transactions. Unlike typical M&A, franchise M&A requires navigating both the underlying business assets and the franchise relationship itself, which is governed by the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD), state franchise laws, and often heavily negotiated agreements. Decision-makers frequently underestimate how much of the deal's value and risk depends on understanding franchisor consent requirements, the transferability of franchise rights, and the extent to which an acquirer assumes successor liability for the franchisee's obligations. This article examines the core legal issues that should drive your evaluation and timing.
Читать далее
How to Address Key Risk Allocation in M&A Agreements
3 Practical Points on M&A Agreements from Counsel: Representations and warranties drive post-closing disputes, transaction structure determines tax exposure, and indemnification caps limit recovery.Mergers and acquisitions involve complex contractual frameworks that determine how risk is allocated between buyer and seller, what representations each party makes about the business, and what remedies exist if those representations prove inaccurate after closing. For in-house counsel and deal decision-makers, the M&A agreement is the controlling document that governs the entire transaction, yet many negotiators focus on purchase price and deal timing while underestimating the operational and financial consequences embedded in the agreement's risk allocation provisions. This analysis addresses the core legal issues that create the most significant exposure in M&A transactions and the strategic considerations counsel should evaluate before execution.
Читать далее
Hart-Scott-Rodino Filing Procedures and How to Manage Risks
3 Bottom-Line Points on Hart Scott Rodino Filing from Counsel: Jurisdictional thresholds trigger mandatory disclosure, 30-day initial review window, and substantial penalties for non-compliance.Hart Scott Rodino filing requirements apply to acquisitions and mergers that meet specific size thresholds under federal antitrust law. The process demands careful attention to timing, valuation methodology, and disclosure completeness. Missteps in Hart Scott Rodino filing can expose parties to civil penalties, injunctive relief, and transaction delays that reshape deal economics.
Читать далее
