1. Personal Injury Law Firm New Jersey Newark Background of the Criminal Complaint
The client contacted a personal injury law firm New Jersey after being charged with assault following a complaint filed by a former partner.
The complainant alleged that the client knowingly concealed a prior infection and caused bodily harm.
Under New Jersey law, such allegations are typically prosecuted under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1, which governs assault offenses.
Relationship History and Medical Disclosure
Before beginning the relationship, the client had previously been treated for a medical condition and had received documented negative test results confirming resolution.
The personal injury law firm New Jersey reviewed medical records establishing that treatment had concluded successfully.
The client informed his partner about the prior condition before engaging in intimacy.
Written messages confirmed that disclosure occurred, which became central to the defense.
Applicable Assault Statute under New Jersey Law
New Jersey defines simple assault under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1(a) as causing bodily injury purposely, knowingly, or recklessly.
Bodily injury includes physical pain, illness, or impairment of physical condition.
The prosecution needed to prove both causation and a culpable mental state.
The personal injury law firm New Jersey focused its strategy on demonstrating the absence of both elements.
2. Personal Injury Law Firm New Jersey Newark Legal Framework and Core Issues
The personal injury law firm New Jersey structured the defense around two primary issues: whether the client knowingly exposed the complainant to harm and whether the alleged injury could be medically attributed to him.
Both issues required factual and expert analysis rather than assumption.
Disclosure and Intent Analysis
The defense presented digital communications showing that the client disclosed his prior diagnosis and treatment history.
The complainant acknowledged awareness of the prior condition before engaging in unprotected contact.
Because criminal liability requires proof of purposeful or knowing conduct under N.J.S.A. 2C:2-2, the absence of concealment was critical.
The personal injury law firm New Jersey argued that a disclosed and resolved condition cannot establish intentional infliction of harm.
Medical Evidence and Causation Review
Independent medical evaluations demonstrated that the client tested negative at the time of the complainant’s positive result.
Laboratory findings showed no matching strain or confirmed transmission link.
The personal injury law firm New Jersey introduced expert testimony explaining alternative modes of exposure and incubation timelines.
Without scientific evidence of transmission, the prosecution could not satisfy the causation requirement.
3. Personal Injury Law Firm New Jersey Newark Defense Strategy in Court
The personal injury law firm New Jersey approached the matter with early evidence preservation and structured presentation of medical documentation.
Rather than relying on emotional rebuttal, the defense centered on statutory interpretation and factual precision.
Cross Examination and Evidentiary Presentation
During trial, counsel emphasized inconsistencies in the complainant’s timeline.
Medical records revealed testing gaps that predated the relationship.
The personal injury law firm New Jersey demonstrated that the complainant had other potential exposure sources.
By highlighting these inconsistencies, the defense created reasonable doubt regarding both intent and causation.
Burden of Proof and Reasonable Doubt Standard
Criminal cases in New Jersey require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
The personal injury law firm New Jersey repeatedly reminded the court that suspicion cannot replace evidence.
Because the prosecution lacked definitive proof of transmission and intent, the statutory threshold under N.J.S.A. 2C:12-1 was not met.
4. Personal Injury Law Firm New Jersey Newark Verdict and Broader Implications
After reviewing the evidence, the court entered a verdict of not guilty.
The personal injury law firm New Jersey successfully established that the statutory elements of assault were not proven.
Acquittal and Case Dismissal
The court found insufficient evidence to establish that the defendant caused bodily injury or acted with the required mental state.
The personal injury law firm New Jersey secured a full acquittal.
No conviction was entered, and the defendant avoided criminal penalties.
Guidance for Individuals Facing Similar Allegations
Allegations involving disease transmission require careful medical and legal analysis.
Individuals facing such accusations should seek immediate representation from a personal injury law firm New Jersey to ensure preservation of medical evidence and accurate presentation of facts.
Early intervention can prevent escalation and protect long term reputation.
24 Feb, 2026
