Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Civil Litigation

Ad Hoc Arbitration

Your contract says disputes go to arbitration but names no institution, or it adopts the UNCITRAL rules and leaves the rest to the parties. Now there is a dispute, and nobody is sure who sets the process in motion.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Ad Hoc Arbitration: what usually happens

How it differs from institutional arbitration

In ad hoc arbitration, no organization administers the case. The parties, and then the tribunal, handle what an institution would otherwise do: appointing arbitrators, setting the schedule, managing fees, and arranging hearings. Many ad hoc agreements adopt the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, which are widely used in international business and provide a framework without an administering body. The approach can save administrative fees and offer flexibility, but it relies heavily on cooperation, and a reluctant party can slow things down. Awards from ad hoc proceedings are generally enforceable in the same way as institutional awards, including across borders under the international treaty on recognizing arbitral awards.

When the process stalls

The most common problem is getting the tribunal formed. If one side refuses to appoint an arbitrator, the agreement or the adopted rules usually provide a fallback, such as an appointing authority chosen by the parties or designated through an international body. Courts, including New York courts, can also step in to appoint an arbitrator when the agreed method breaks down, and they can address some procedural questions in support of the arbitration. Keep the arbitration clause, every notice sent under it, and the dates, because the rules often tie deadlines to when a notice was received. Where the clause is vague about the seat or the number of arbitrators, those gaps can become the first dispute.

Planning the case

Our starting point is the clause and the rules it adopts. From there we identify the seat of the arbitration and work out which courts can support or review the process. We look at whether the other side is likely to cooperate and what that means for timing and cost. We also discuss practical choices the parties will need to make, such as the language of the proceedings and how hearings will be conducted. For a contract still being negotiated, the same review helps decide whether ad hoc or institutional arbitration suits the relationship.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about ad hoc arbitration and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.