Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Administrative

Article 78 Proceeding

The agency's final decision is in hand, and you have decided to challenge it in court. An Article 78 proceeding moves quickly and on paper, so the steps in the first weeks matter.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Article 78 Proceeding: what usually happens

The agency stage shapes the case

An Article 78 proceeding is generally decided on the record the agency had in front of it, which means much of the case is built before anyone goes to court. Courts usually expect available administrative appeals to be completed first, with limited exceptions such as when pursuing them would be futile. Anything you want a judge to consider, such as documents, objections, and legal arguments, should ideally be presented to the agency while the matter is still pending there. If you are already past that stage, gather everything you submitted and everything the agency sent you. The deadline to file is short and usually runs from when the decision became final and binding.

Starting and serving the proceeding

The proceeding is commenced by filing a verified petition, usually with a notice of petition or an order to show cause, in State Supreme Court. The petition sets out the facts, the decision being challenged, and the relief requested, supported by affidavits and exhibits. It must be served on the agency or official, and when a state body is involved, service on the Attorney General's office is generally required as well. Mistakes in service can lead to dismissal, sometimes after the filing deadline has passed. The agency then answers and typically files the record of the proceedings below, which becomes the core of what the court reviews.

Interim relief and possible outcomes

If the agency's decision is about to take effect, for example a license suspension or a termination, an order to show cause can include a request for a temporary stay while the court considers the petition. When the challenge concerns a determination made after a formal evidentiary hearing, the case may be transferred to the Appellate Division to decide whether the record supports it. A court that agrees with the petitioner often annuls the decision and sends the matter back to the agency to decide again. Either side can usually appeal the court's judgment. Our early review confirms the deadline, identifies the right parties to serve, and considers whether interim relief is needed.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about article 78 proceeding and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.