Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Administrative

Bank Regulatory Compliance

An exam team has finished its visit and left findings that need a board-level response, or a fintech partner has learned that the bank behind its product is now under a consent order.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Bank Regulatory Compliance: what usually happens

Knowing which regulator is in the room

Bank regulatory compliance starts with the charter. A national bank answers mainly to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, a state-chartered bank to its state regulator together with either the Federal Reserve or the FDIC, and in New York the state side is the Department of Financial Services. Larger institutions also deal with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on consumer protection matters, and anti-money laundering duties run across all of them. Each agency has its own examination cycle, rating system, and enforcement tools. Fintech companies that offer accounts or cards through a sponsor bank are not usually examined directly, but they feel supervision through the bank, which passes its regulators' expectations down in contracts, audits, and sudden program changes.

Handling the exam record carefully

Exam reports, ratings, and supervisory letters are generally treated as confidential supervisory information, and that information belongs to the regulator rather than to the bank. Sharing it with a vendor, an investor, or even outside advisers can require the agency's permission, so ask before forwarding anything. Keep the findings, management's responses, and evidence showing each corrective step was actually completed and tested, since examiners often return to earlier findings first. Board minutes matter too. Regulators look for signs that directors understood the issues and pushed for answers, not merely that a policy was approved.

Choosing how to respond

A first review looks at where the institution stands: routine findings, a matter requiring board attention, an informal agreement, or a formal order. Each calls for a different tone and a different level of detail, and commitments made in a response letter tend to become the yardstick for the next exam. When a formal action is proposed, terms are usually negotiated before anything is made public, and timing can be tight. For fintech partners, we review the program agreement to see what the bank can require, what it can change on short notice, and what happens to customers if the relationship ends.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about bank regulatory compliance and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.