Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate & Bankruptcy

Creditors Agreement

Payments are slipping, several creditors are calling, and someone suggests making one deal with all of them instead of filing for bankruptcy. Whether that holds depends on who signs and what the paper actually binds.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Creditors Agreement: what usually happens

Two kinds of agreement under one name

The phrase usually describes one of two arrangements. One is an out-of-court workout, in which a struggling business or individual agrees with its creditors to stretch payment terms, reduce balances, or exchange debt for equity. The other is an intercreditor or subordination agreement, in which lenders to the same borrower settle who is paid first and who controls enforcement. Both are contracts, so they bind those who sign them and generally no one else. That is the sharpest contrast with a confirmed Chapter 11 plan, which in some circumstances can bind creditors who voted against it, and it explains why a single holdout can unsettle a workout everyone else accepted.

Where workouts tend to come apart

Creditors who agree to wait often want something back, such as new collateral, a personal guarantee from an owner, or a forbearance fee, and each concession has consequences if a bankruptcy follows anyway. Paying some creditors in full while others wait can later be challenged in a bankruptcy case, and new liens granted to secure old debt draw particular scrutiny. Forgiven debt can also carry tax consequences for the borrower that are easy to miss in the relief of reaching a deal. Lenders, for their part, often discover that intercreditor terms they signed long ago do not say what they assumed about payment priority, standstill periods, or voting in a later case.

Getting ready for the negotiation

Start with a complete list of creditors showing balances, collateral, and any guarantees, together with cash-flow projections realistic enough for creditors to test. Loan documents and any existing intercreditor or subordination agreements show what each party can already demand. If you are a creditor being asked to sign, gather your own contract, the payment history, and whatever the debtor has disclosed about its other obligations. We look first at whether an agreement outside court can realistically hold, and at what a bankruptcy filing would change for each side. That comparison tends to shape the terms more than anything said across the table.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about creditors agreement and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.