Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Cross-Border

Cross Border Investigations

A regulator in one country asks questions, and soon authorities elsewhere are asking too. A cross-border investigation forces a company to answer to several legal systems at the same time, often with overlapping requests and conflicting rules.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Cross Border Investigations: what usually happens

How multi-country inquiries develop

Investigations involving bribery, sanctions, export controls, fraud, or competition issues often cross borders because companies, transactions, and evidence do. A U.S. agency such as the Department of Justice or the SEC may coordinate with foreign authorities, and information shared between them can shape each inquiry. Each country applies its own procedures, penalties, and approach to cooperation credit, and resolving a matter with one authority does not necessarily end exposure elsewhere. An internal investigation by the company adds another layer, especially when employees in several countries must be interviewed in different languages.

Data, privilege, and employees

Moving documents across borders for an investigation is not always straightforward. Data protection laws in Europe, Korea, China, and elsewhere can restrict transfers of personal data, and some countries limit providing evidence to foreign authorities without government approval. Privilege rules differ too: protections that apply to communications with lawyers in the United States may be narrower elsewhere, including for in-house counsel. When company lawyers interview employees, the employees should understand that those lawyers represent the company, and some employees may need counsel of their own. Preserve documents in place where possible, and coordinate with counsel before moving data from one country to another.

Setting a coordinated plan

In an early meeting we look at which authorities are involved, what they have asked for, and where the relevant people and data are located. We discuss how to sequence responses, how to work with local counsel in other countries, and how to keep the company's positions consistent across jurisdictions. We also consider whether cooperating with or disclosing to one authority may affect the company's position with another. Where individuals face exposure, we address whether they need separate representation. The aim is a coordinated response rather than a series of separate reactions to each new request.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about cross border investigations and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.