Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocationsGo to integrated search
Go to integrated search
Cross-Border

Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions

Two companies in different countries have decided to combine. How the combination is built legally, and how the businesses are joined afterward, will shape costs and risks for a long time.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions: what usually happens

Building the combination

A direct merger of two companies formed in different countries is often unavailable or impractical, so cross border mergers and acquisitions are commonly done through a share purchase, an asset purchase, or a merger with a local subsidiary of the buyer. Buying shares usually brings along the target's history, including its liabilities, while an asset purchase lets the buyer choose what to take but may require transferring contracts, permits, and employees one by one. Paying with the buyer's stock raises securities law questions in each country where target shareholders live. Tax consequences differ sharply among these routes, and the structure that suits one side may not suit the other.

Integration after closing

Closing is the start of a second project. Contracts with change-of-control or anti-assignment clauses may need consents if they were not obtained before closing. Intellectual property should be recorded in the right owner's name in each country where it is registered. Employment terms, benefit plans, and data flows between the companies need to be aligned with local law, and some countries require consultation with employee representatives before changes are made. Intercompany agreements for services, licensing, and financing should be documented so the tax position holds up. Leaving these tasks for later tends to make them more expensive.

Where we start with you

We look at the business rationale first: what the combined company should look like, where its management and assets will sit, and how owners on each side expect to be paid. That shapes the structure we recommend you review with your tax advisers. We then coordinate with counsel in each relevant country on the steps the chosen structure requires. Planning integration during the deal, rather than after it, is one of the most practical things the parties can do, and we raise those issues early in the documents. Bring a summary of each company's business, its main locations, and its ownership, along with any term sheet the parties have exchanged.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about cross border mergers and acquisitions and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.