Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Digital Evidence

eDiscovery Strategy

A lawsuit has started, and the facts that matter are spread across email, chat platforms, phones, and cloud apps, on both sides. Deciding what to chase, and what to leave alone, is a strategic choice.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

eDiscovery Strategy: what usually happens

Starting from what the case must prove

A sound eDiscovery strategy works backward from the claims and defenses: which facts need proof, which people were involved, and during what period. That shapes which custodians and systems to preserve and collect on your side, and which to target in requests to the other side. Collaboration tools like Slack or Teams, text messages, and personal devices used for work often hold the most candid material. Federal rules require discovery to be proportional to the needs of the case, and New York state courts, including the Commercial Division, have their own rules and expectations for electronic discovery. Understanding where data lives, in what format, and who controls it lets you negotiate scope from an informed position.

Protocols, tools, and privilege

Parties often agree on an ESI protocol covering search terms, date ranges, custodians, production formats, and how privilege logs will be handled. Technology-assisted review and other analytics can reduce review volume, and courts increasingly accept them when the process is transparent and validated. In federal cases, a court order protecting against waiver if privileged material is produced by mistake is worth seeking early. Data held by affiliates in Korea, Europe, or elsewhere may be subject to privacy and data transfer laws that limit collection and require planning. Keep a record of decisions about scope and the reasons behind them.

Lost data and incomplete productions

When electronic information that should have been preserved is lost, courts can order measures to cure the prejudice, and in federal court the most severe sanctions generally require a finding of intent to deprive the other side of the information. That still leaves room for costly consequences short of those sanctions, so early, documented preservation steps remain the most reliable protection. If the other side's production seems thin, specific and reasonable follow-up requests usually get further than broad accusations. We start by mapping the data landscape, the claims, and the deadlines, then build a plan that balances cost against risk.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 INSIGHTS

Further reading

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about ediscovery strategy and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.