Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocationsGo to integrated search
Go to integrated search
Fraud & White Collar

False Claims Act Lawsuit

The seal has been lifted and the case is now public. Whether the government joined or the relator is going forward alone, the False Claims Act lawsuit now moves into ordinary federal court, with a few rules that set it apart from other civil suits.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

False Claims Act Lawsuit: what usually happens

After the seal lifts

Once unsealed, the complaint is served on the defendant and the case proceeds in federal district court. A defendant usually responds with a motion to dismiss, and these motions often focus on whether the complaint describes false claims with enough detail, whether the alleged violation was material to payment, and whether the suit is barred because it rests on public information or followed another relator's filing. In a declined case, the relator and the relator's counsel carry the cost and risk of litigation, while the government watches and can still weigh in. A qui tam suit generally cannot be voluntarily dismissed without the government's written consent, even when it declined to intervene, and the government usually has a say in any settlement.

Discovery and proof

If the case survives dismissal, discovery can be broad and costly: claims data, billing policies, internal audits, and the communications of many employees. Damages are often proved through statistical sampling of claims, and both sides typically retain witnesses on billing practices and damages calculations. The relator's own conduct and documents are also open to examination, which is why how the relator gathered materials matters. Retaliation claims, if any, belong to the relator personally and proceed alongside the main case. Throughout, the government may file statements of interest on legal questions that affect its programs.

Choosing a course

For relators, the key decisions after a decline are whether to continue, what resources the case will require, and whether the defendant is open to resolution. For defendants, the decisions are how hard to press dismissal, whether to approach the government about its position, and how the litigation might affect relationships with agencies the company still serves. At the outset we read the complaint, the government's notice of intervention or declination, and the court schedule, and set out what the next stage is likely to require. Neither side should assume that a quick settlement or a quick dismissal is available.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about false claims act lawsuit and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.